tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38051381584412457012024-02-19T05:22:55.779+00:00The Mind of a Helmet Camera CyclistI'm a helmet camera using cycle commuter in Glasgow (Torrance). I love it! It's fun, it keeps me fit, it's quicker than driving the car, and it benefits the environment.
The VAST majority of my commutes are fun and incident free. Sometimes though things happen that endanger me and others. So I film my commute and post it on YouTube.
This is my story...magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.comBlogger350125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-31208481193713105942021-03-15T17:45:00.444+00:002021-03-18T17:41:22.813+00:00Outcome of Police Complaint<h1 style="text-align: left;"><br></h1><div><i>I haven't written a blog for a while, as I have been living my online life via Twitter most of the time. However, this particular issue required more than a Twitter thread, so the blog re-awakens...</i></div><div><br></div><div>If you follow me on Twitter you will be aware that back in 2019 I was assaulted whilst cycling to work. You will also be aware that the driver who assaulted me was only given a warning. Further to that I was then given a section 38 warning (effectively a warning for breach of the peace) for the same incident. My warning was given for swearing after I had been driven at, abused and then punched.</div><div><br></div><div>If you don't follow me on Twitter, or you need a recap, <a href="https://www.cyclinguk.org/news/cycling-uk-demands-reform-after-assaulted-cyclist-warned-swearing" target="_blank">then this article by Cycling UK Scotland</a> (who helped me through the ordeal) should bring you up to speed. A direct link to the video in question is also below.</div><div><br></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="317" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xYp2BBEVO28" width="480" youtube-src-id="xYp2BBEVO28"></iframe></div><br><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>As discussed in the article this incident has sparked a Cycling UK Scotland campaign to improve policing specifically around road violence and the use of camera footage. However, this post is not discussing that campaign. This post discusses my formal complaint to the police. </div><div><br></div><h3 style="text-align: left;">My Complaint</h3><div>As part of the formal complaint process Police Scotland assigned an Inspector from a different part of the police force to help me pull together the formal compliant. During that process, which was conducted very professionally by the officer, we produced a document that went to the police complaints team. There were actually five separate complaints contained within that document. They were as follows:</div><div><br></div><div><ol style="text-align: left;"><li>Between 14 October and 29 November 2020, the initial officers who took my report failed to update me with the result of the enquiry despite the fact that I contacted 101 on several occasions and left messages for them. </li><li>Police have failed to obtain a statement from a witness which would have corroborated the Dangerous Driving, Assault and Breach of the Peace offences that I reported on 14 October 2019 which subsequently have not been reported to the Procurator Fiscal.</li><li>The suspect was issued with a Recorded Police Warning for the offence of Assault only which I believe was not suitable or appropriate given the circumstances of the offences committed by the suspect.</li><li>On the 3 February 2020, nearly 4 months after the initial incident, I was issued with a Recorded Police warning which I believe was inappropriate in the circumstances and was as a direct result of the footage and comments that I posted on social media, stating my intention to make a complaint about the police.</li><li>On 3 February 2020, the officers who issued me with a Recorded Police Warning failed to provide sufficient information regarding the warning process/procedure.</li></ol><div>These complaints along with details relating to each complaint were submitted in February. I was told that an outcome could take several months due to the need to take statements from those involved. However, I was surprised to recently receive an outcome less than one month later.</div></div><div><br></div><div>Below is the response letter with names and identifying details removed. I've blanked out officer names with colours which always correspond to the same officer. Apologies if you cannot make out the difference in colours, but I couldn't think of any other simple way to do it, and it should be obvious who is who. Please click on each picture to zoom in.</div><div><br></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0zGeJKbzqAvl1Za0xj7HaK5-puKhFppvYQ_CtKdLl24B9xdziQyYHzYf_9-yAcXHgvpWUtLztLmv-y2_v3hmT1ecTZhWORjlFwQyCYVixW2Fc1iuDdeArnafPE2spMUNAfgyHv_AjSxhG/s910/complain_response_page1.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="910" data-original-width="645" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0zGeJKbzqAvl1Za0xj7HaK5-puKhFppvYQ_CtKdLl24B9xdziQyYHzYf_9-yAcXHgvpWUtLztLmv-y2_v3hmT1ecTZhWORjlFwQyCYVixW2Fc1iuDdeArnafPE2spMUNAfgyHv_AjSxhG/w227-h320/complain_response_page1.png" width="227"></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqvYKcU4YCrPYpJ59OC-Qa8rBWkPm6fjn62HgMy7Pjy3qbqrZsTHMJw4CuUsxkSsym0NksxA3LtV7SEwqOxZz3Lu2DncJ9bc-hv34vMD8jrne3Pa5o8LnRT3FNbRJwCQGt_3Tz1JOS0RVj/s901/complain_response_page2.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="901" data-original-width="648" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqvYKcU4YCrPYpJ59OC-Qa8rBWkPm6fjn62HgMy7Pjy3qbqrZsTHMJw4CuUsxkSsym0NksxA3LtV7SEwqOxZz3Lu2DncJ9bc-hv34vMD8jrne3Pa5o8LnRT3FNbRJwCQGt_3Tz1JOS0RVj/w230-h320/complain_response_page2.png" width="230"></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgK-KM1mhv0MUOsPJogUskKlqD23hWoWYYBK9DmAbbjzNtHqVM4UJSdyrFtVM1jQULcfubEnHkx-WZxJAkOdtBlq37myCo_PmxmB58PHl6Z6a8SZC-7Qq6oRfg2oP9y3v7_JcSSnkDAjpor/s895/complain_response_page3.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="895" data-original-width="645" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgK-KM1mhv0MUOsPJogUskKlqD23hWoWYYBK9DmAbbjzNtHqVM4UJSdyrFtVM1jQULcfubEnHkx-WZxJAkOdtBlq37myCo_PmxmB58PHl6Z6a8SZC-7Qq6oRfg2oP9y3v7_JcSSnkDAjpor/w230-h320/complain_response_page3.png" width="230"></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6WkPMoA_t8aTFBvqo4kQv_xhRPIxyEx9GeI0KEhTBVuP5tPN5YeBExmipORTH52URf-kuzhV2_eWSqpZq080ftXGeylv7L9LLvJGTPKyYguorPRMKOGZBEilSRFsXv29SaXgqDaePW6jr/s888/complain_response_page4.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="888" data-original-width="645" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6WkPMoA_t8aTFBvqo4kQv_xhRPIxyEx9GeI0KEhTBVuP5tPN5YeBExmipORTH52URf-kuzhV2_eWSqpZq080ftXGeylv7L9LLvJGTPKyYguorPRMKOGZBEilSRFsXv29SaXgqDaePW6jr/w232-h320/complain_response_page4.png" width="232"></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br><br><div style="text-align: left;"><br><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMeirIZg8UnwtbkLdVtyMquNoIQi5f-UW71EAMs7BN4uJ0PlwMzcSgsAcBd8UNJsrPYGlNjwSbMiWNQjKrLdgqvF6LTFyM1PBIiiRInvDeeTx6jqTHzS7_e6kAHV8l4tNcKzUyl00mPQJ7/s877/complain_response_page5.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="877" data-original-width="642" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMeirIZg8UnwtbkLdVtyMquNoIQi5f-UW71EAMs7BN4uJ0PlwMzcSgsAcBd8UNJsrPYGlNjwSbMiWNQjKrLdgqvF6LTFyM1PBIiiRInvDeeTx6jqTHzS7_e6kAHV8l4tNcKzUyl00mPQJ7/w234-h320/complain_response_page5.png" width="234"></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdfRp4_FSKC-swzo6NwlRBbUYclswIKh5SQ3aDAS-zb0oJC_6Q3u27IDq47pWuXeYaJzIyU_bnQ2SGB4e4ucDAivhKym2gEuOflHGe2xAGog13hUDm5ddzwPPzuaj0jYlj6JK6Ujk6EquL/s873/complain_response_page6.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="873" data-original-width="647" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdfRp4_FSKC-swzo6NwlRBbUYclswIKh5SQ3aDAS-zb0oJC_6Q3u27IDq47pWuXeYaJzIyU_bnQ2SGB4e4ucDAivhKym2gEuOflHGe2xAGog13hUDm5ddzwPPzuaj0jYlj6JK6Ujk6EquL/w237-h320/complain_response_page6.png" width="237"></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwO0yg4ITap5TkJ-b4474ElA-OfQDbWLuvf9wDBhQmnXvfrILuEpPachhFhbUe1mYxs9AxuYJteoMxuB7_xwhIj7P5xb0dm3mp5S0N77LkycRo8crLk3bMJqxQ_wui2rfQ1SjWeBiGmFdU/s913/complain_response_page7.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="913" data-original-width="643" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwO0yg4ITap5TkJ-b4474ElA-OfQDbWLuvf9wDBhQmnXvfrILuEpPachhFhbUe1mYxs9AxuYJteoMxuB7_xwhIj7P5xb0dm3mp5S0N77LkycRo8crLk3bMJqxQ_wui2rfQ1SjWeBiGmFdU/s320/complain_response_page7.png"></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;"><b>In summary, all five of my complaints were upheld and the Area Commander will be tasked with investigating further.</b></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;">There were some areas that are worth highlighting.</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><h3 style="text-align: left;">Injury Ignored - Driver Warning</h3><div style="text-align: left;">I remember very clearly the day the officers came to speak to me and I also remember very clearly pointing out that I had an injury from the assault. By the time the officers had come the swelling from the injury had mostly settled down and the bruising subsided. I remember mentioning that it was only a slight injury, and that I've had worse, but I had pictures (see below for a picture I took when I arrived at work). I remember one of them saying that they didn't need any photos. </div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;">That injury, however slight was reason enough that the driver should not just have been given a warning. That in itself meant that the charge should have been sent to the Procurator Fiscal for further consideration. It wasn't.</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwr_7VWdPhep3Xv3z5snX_lwQ3jEbWk216Uryv4bAMK9krgurctJlyYTkpRlp1YqL0OTc0HBFZEyWn-00kiTlfFtBE77u1So9ZQFda3beVE4ir3NnTvLOr-V0dLXLMVZ4LgIAt2k4mdt1K/s800/lip_main.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="667" data-original-width="800" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwr_7VWdPhep3Xv3z5snX_lwQ3jEbWk216Uryv4bAMK9krgurctJlyYTkpRlp1YqL0OTc0HBFZEyWn-00kiTlfFtBE77u1So9ZQFda3beVE4ir3NnTvLOr-V0dLXLMVZ4LgIAt2k4mdt1K/s320/lip_main.jpg" width="320"></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Not the worst injury (or my best photo!), but an injury none the less.</td></tr></tbody></table><br><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><h3 style="text-align: left;">No Witness Statement - Driver Warning</h3><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">No independent witness statement was collected. Whilst the witness was initially contacted over the phone (and apparently backed up my version of events fully), the police never followed up to collect a statement. The witness actually tried to contact the police to do so, but was never called back. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">The officer investigating my complaint suggests that this was '<b>wholly irregular, especially as the evidence provided by this witness was then used for the issuing of the RPW (warning)</b>'. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Why was no witness statement collected?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br></div><h3 style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Persistent and Alarming Conduct - Driver Warning</h3><div style="clear: both; text-align: left;">As the officer investigating my complaints points out, not only should injury prevent the police from giving a warning only, but in cases where there is 'persistent or alarming conduct which makes individuals scared for their safety' then a warning isn't sufficient. </div><div style="clear: both; text-align: left;">It is abundantly clear to anyone watching the footage that this individual was clearly persistent. It starts with him driving his car at me, then coming out of his car, being abusive, pushing several times, punching, walking away, and then coming back to abuse me more. He even mentions something about having issues with me before (not to my knowledge). Very clearly persistent.</div><div style="clear: both; text-align: left;">As for 'alarming', well, I don't even think I need to say anything in that regard. His actions in this incident were very clearly alarming not only in the legal sense, but in any sense. </div><div style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br></div></div></div></div><h3 style="text-align: left;">Driver Warning - Overall</h3><div style="text-align: left;">With regards to the driver being warned we effectively have three major failings. The police ignored my injury, didn't bother to take a police witness statement and chose to ignore the obvious persistent and alarming conduct. It is pretty clear then that the police did not investigate the driver properly or with any significant effort. This is interesting especially considering the effort that then went into investigating me...</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><h3 style="text-align: left;">My Warning</h3><div style="text-align: left;">The police confirmed in their statements for this complaint that my conduct during this incident was only considered an issue <b>AFTER</b> I had posted my video online and <b>AFTER</b> I had publicly complained about the driver's warning. (It turns out I was correct to complain!) However, that wasn't considered by the unnamed Inspector. Instead that unnamed Inspector did consider that my conduct contravened section 38 of the Criminal and Justice Licensing Scotland Act 2010. </div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;">The Inspector had a chat with a Sergeant. This was the Sergeant that contacted me to say that he was looking into 'further criminality'. This Sergeant states in his statement that he thought there was a 'possibility' that I'd committed a criminal act and so asked a PC to investigate. The decision on whether to charge or not was left to the PC. It is, then, particular interesting in this case is that this particular PC has failed to provide a statement (is that even allowed?!). Did that PC really make the final decision? Did he really have any say in the decision? Why did he not follow up with the independent witness?</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;">Its important to note that no complaint was received from a member of the public about my conduct during this incident. An Inspector viewed the footage online. Perhaps that Inspector follows me on Twitter? Perhaps a colleague pointed out the footage to him or her. We can't be sure how they came across it, but it is important to note that at that time I had NOT contacted the police and no-one else had contacted the police to complain about me (that I am aware of).</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;">The Inspector having viewed the video online would also have seen all the comments surrounding it, the vast majority who were shocked by the drivers conduct. I can only find one comment suggesting I should have been charged with something, and they suggest vandalism! </div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;">The officer investigating my complaint agrees that the Sergeant made the right assessment (that is that a crime 'may have been committed'). That is fair enough, as I did swear loudly, though very mildly! So yes, it may have been committed, until you actually consider the facts. However, as pointed out in the complaint investigation, my conduct did not meet the threshold of the relevant legislation. Why? I guess for three reasons. Firstly, I quite clearly did not intend to create fear and alarm as I was just reacting instinctively to events. Secondly, it is a defence that the person charged, i.e. me, behaved in a way that was reasonable in those particular circumstances... For example, shouting mild profanities having been driven at, abused and assaulted! Finally, had they actually spoken to the independent witness, they would have learned that they did not think I caused any fear or alarm!</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;">So it seems there was no reasonable legal basis to give me a police warning, yet it would appear that an unnamed Inspector, spotting some footage online where I complain about the police response to an incident, did. Oh and one police officer in the centre of this is not willing to provide a statement. Oh, oh, oh and the Inspector hasn't even been asked for a statement, which is the one thing that the complaint procedure seems to have avoided. Why? It certainly would have been interesting to hear what he/she had to say.</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><h3 style="text-align: left;">Overall Outcome</h3><div style="text-align: left;">Overall, I think it was pretty clear that I was messed around by the police from start to finish (although the complaint's process itself was very smooth). Why I was messed around in this way, be it incompetence, malice, or something else, remains a mystery. Whilst it certainly could be argued that some of the issues were created by incompetence, to me, and this is of course just my opinion, it feels like I was targeted. How, looking at the footage, taking into account witness account, (which was absolutely offered at every stage, but ignored), considering that I was the victim, and taking into account the legalities I was considered guilty of a Section 38 offence, beggars belief.</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;">I do though feel some form of vindication in this. It has been a long, and at times, very stressful process which has clearly highlighted many of the failings of the system. It really is weighted against the protection of vulnerable road users, even without these specific failings. This is why I feel the campaign with Cycling UK Scotland is important (<a href="https://action.cyclinguk.org/page/75816/petition/1?locale=en-GB" target="_blank">please sign their petition!!</a>). </div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;">In the end, it all comes down to trust and having been through this experience I find it very, very hard to trust the police with any incident I report. Yes, the complaint finished with some nice words, and a promise to do better, but without changes to the system, I and you will always be at the mercy of the current system, which is evidently broken. That's why it is time to fix it.</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;">Will I hear anything back about the Area Commander's investigation? I suspect not, at least not without me chasing it up, perhaps with Freedom of Information requests or similar. Will anything change? We'll see.</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><br><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br></div><br><br><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br></div><br></div><br><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br></div><br></div><br><div><br></div>magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-7074921220320933552019-09-13T13:09:00.002+01:002019-09-13T13:12:36.380+01:00My Procurator Fiscal Letter<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">The following is a letter I have just sent to the Procurator Fiscal office in relation to <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FO0ghcWrbmU">this incident</a>.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Dear Sir/madam,</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">I am writing to you with regards to the case against xxx xxx (PF No: xxx).</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">I attended court yesterday as a witness in this case, having attended court previously on the 17th July, where the case was delayed. Whilst waiting for the case to commence I was informed that the driver had pled guilty and that I was no longer required in court. Unfortunately the Court Clerk did not know what exact charge the driver had pled to, and did not know the sentencing. I therefore phoned the Procurator Fiscal office later that day.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">After passing on my details over the phone the operator was able to inform me off the sentencing outcome, but for some reason was not allowed to tell me what the driver pled guilty to. I'm not sure why I could find out one, but not the other. I was informed I would need to write to you to find out any other information. I know Mr xxx was fined £150 and received 3 points. Can you tell me if this was in relation to careless or dangerous driving?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Going by the level of fine and points that Mr xxx received I can only assume that the charge was dropped to careless. Can I ask for you to please inform me of how the PF assigned to this case managed to justify accepting this?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">I am not sure if your systems allow you to view footage on YouTube. If they do though, you can view the camera footage of the incident in question here (<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FO0ghcWrbmU">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FO0ghcWrbmU</a>). As you will see from the footage, I was placed by this drivers actions, in significant danger and suffered significant distress. The van that Mr xxx passed me in missed my right arm with centimetres to spare, at high speed, with an oncoming HGV.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Firstly, taking into consideration section 2A of the Road Traffic Act 1988, could this driving not be considered dangerous? It is obvious to any 'competent driver' that this driving falls 'far below what would be expected of a competent and careful driver'. Further, it certainly would be obvious to any competent driver that 'driving in this way would be dangerous'. Had his vehicle been a few centimetres further to the left, it would certainly have resulted in my serious injury or perhaps death. As a cyclist I have absolutely no crumple zone or roll cage to protect me.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">I am sure that Mr xxx is an upstanding citizen, and this may indeed be the first time that Mr xxx has been charged with an offence, however the consequences of his actions, should his positioning have been only very slightly different, or should I have wobbled even slightly to my right, could have been very serious to myself, a husband and father of three. Why then did the PF agree to reduce the charge to careless (my assumption) considering the level of driving concerned, the very obvious danger that it represented and the very real effect that this could have had on my family?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Further to the above, having allowed for the charge to be dropped from dangerous to careless (again my assumption), why has the PF allowed for the sentencing to be almost as low as it is possible to be? Why for example, when a driver has clearly and of his own free will put another person at significant risk, at a level of very obviously dangerous driving, has the PF allowed the fine and the points applied to be at a level that is below mobile phone use, or a lack of insurance documents? Yes, the use of mobile phones whilst driving has significant potential to put other road users at risk, and so should be treated seriously, but how can this incident where I was ACTUALLY put at significant risk, and placed in a state of obvious distress, not be sentenced to at least a similar level?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">One thing is clear from this sentencing is, that it is not in any way a deterrent. With sentencing consistent with this, a driver could put 4 cyclists at risk (and potential serious injury or death) before being considered for a driving ban. If you had a family member who cycled, would you consider that justice had been served in a case like this?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">I think it is quite clear from what I have written above that this case and the outcome do not serve the public interest. Therefore, I would be very grateful if you could inform me of the reasoning behind the dropping of the charge (my assumption) and the level of the accepted fine and points.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">I look forward to your detailed reply.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Yours sincerely</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica";"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Dr David Brennan</span></span>
magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-58611923655602713002018-10-12T17:03:00.000+01:002018-10-12T17:03:14.887+01:00I Have Some Questions?Cyclists are bad.<br />
<br />
They run red lights.<br />
They cycle on the pavement.<br />
They are a menace!<br />
<br />
At least that's what some commentators suggest. Is this based in reality? Well yes, some cyclists do do these things. Why though do these commentators focus on these things when all around them, people driving cars do the same, and at greater risk to those surrounding them?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/diSB5yiOYdE/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/diSB5yiOYdE?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />
Why focus on the cyclists?<br />
<br />
Why suggest, either explicitly or implicitly that we shouldn't invest in cycle infrastructure because some behave badly (nearly always endangering themselves and no-one else)?<br />
<br />
Why do people focus their time disparaging an activity that has some many positive upsides for participants, communities, cities and our countries?<br />
<br />
There is no logic. Is there? Please do let me know if there is? Let me know if there is a good logical reason to oppose safe infrastructure for cycling. Don't just base it on your own opinion, as that is almost certainly soaked in bias, as my own opinion almost certainly is. Base it on facts, research and logical argument. Please do.<br />
<br />
Don't go on news programmes looking for soundbites. Don't point-score. Don't smile smugly when you feel like you've got one over on your opponent. Stick to logic. If you are truly right, if the facts and figures are on your side, you will win. Victory is really there for the taking. Why haven't you taken it yet?<br />
<br />
Just don't pluck statistics out of thin air. Or a red bus with words written on the side. I'd definitely avoid that.<br />
<br />
If you can't supply the logic and the facts behind that logic, with evidence, then what is it that drives your passion to stop active travel. Is it fear? Emotion? A sense that you no longer understand or can control the changes going on in the world around you? A niggly feeling that somehow progress, however benign might make your life worse? Perhaps progress is bad? Conflict is good?<br />
<br />
Or are you just a prick, looking for air-time? Seeking attention by verbalising click-bait?<br />
<br />
What is it? Really, what is it!?! I honestly don't have a clue.<br />
<br />
You may realise just now I have so many questions and, I've been quiet for so long, here on this blog, these questions have just built and built until now they feel like they need to explode out of my head.<br />
<br />
So here they are, digitally laid out before you. I'd really appreciate if you start answering them.<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance.<br />
<br />
<br />magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-89030221990699762962017-11-07T20:50:00.001+00:002017-11-07T20:50:26.026+00:00Political, Will or Won'tToday I received a response from Rona Mackay in relation to the questions <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2017/10/bear-way-extension-not-likely.html">I asked previously</a>. You can find the response below.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Hi David,<br />
<br />
Sorry for the delay in replying to you on this matter. Here is the council response to your questions:<br />
<br />
On phase 1 there were serious concerns about the safety of the design, particularly at road junctions and crossings. Given these concerns, the SNP group made a manifesto commitment to make phase 1 of the project safe, and to this end we have discussed with the roads department the following outcomes:<br />
a) The cycle way will be reinstated more prominently by Cala before they leave the site.<br />
b) Where the separation zone juts out we will put in reflectors (this is particularly useful for motorcyclists).<br />
c) Extra clear warnings when there is an access across the cycle lane.<br />
d) Extra bollards at McDonalds.<br />
In addition to the above, the off main road phase (Kessington to Maryhill Road) was reported to the PNCA Committee on Thursday and agreed on. This will be in relation to Traffic Regulation Orders prior to signs being put into use.<br />
In relation to Phase 2, with the complexity of the layout of the A81 at the junctions with Boclair Rd and ASDA it is envisaged that only bigger problems will emerge. At this time there does not appear to be any political will within the council to revisit the next phase of the project.<br />
I know that you will be disappointed regarding Phase 2, but should there be any developments in this regard, I will contact you immediately.<br />
<br />
Best wishes,<br />
Rona</blockquote>
<br />
There are a couple of things of note. First off, there are 4 issues with phase 1 listed. One is that they think there needs to be some reflectors fitted. Secondly, they think some bollards need fitted. Thirdly they think some signs need added and finally the junction at Cala (Allander sports centre junction) needs reinstated to what it was before.<br />
<br />
Remember Rona stated that phase 2 wasn't going ahead because of major issues with the lane.....<br />
<br />
OK, so lets get b), c) and d) out of the way first. Very simple, minor changes. Will they make any difference at all? Almost certainly not. Total waste of tax payers money, if you ask me. However, if it means we can go ahead with phase 2, yeah, lets get some reflectors, bollards and signs.<br />
<br />
a) is a little more interesting. This junction is described on the <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2017/10/bear-way-extension-not-likely.html">Cycling Embassy of Great Britian's</a> blog (11th picture down). Yes, it isn't perfect and Cala, who are doing some house-building nearby dug this junction up and made it worse (what you see now). It needs a bit more of a ramp (OK quite a bit more), some different colouring for the lane and perhaps a slight narrowing of the cycle lane itself (not something I normally ask for!). So actually, what I and Friends of Bearsway want, is more work than the councillors want. They just want it re-instated to what it was before, with a lower ramp and no coloured lane.<br />
<br />
But hey, we sort of agree.<br />
<br />
Wait though, this is a relatively minor alteration of this junction. Yes it might make a big difference, but the actual alteration is minor. So, umm...what are the major changes to phase 1 that are required before phase 2 can begin? Some reflectors, bollards, signs and a slight change to one junction!?!?<br />
<br />
I wonder how much snagging is required on every road build. Do they stop completion of roads until the first has been fully snagged and are perfect?!?!?<br />
<br />
Hauld yer breeks though....there's more. They mention the' off road phase at Kessington/Maryhill'. Well, ok....but this is actually a completely separate issue. Nothing to do with Bears Way at all. Completely and utterly separate. So I've no idea why this was mentioned here.<br />
<br />
Then comes the rub.<br />
<br />
I'll summarise<br />
<br />
<b>We think phase 2 might be difficult, so we would rather not do it, thank you very much. Making active travel a real alternative, so that it's not just for the brave, is just too darn difficult. Sure, there are more cyclist injuries in the area where phase 2 would go, but we are more concerned about getting voted in by Mr and Mr Angry of Bearsden and Milngavie at the next election, than actually giving two tosses about active travel. Traffic levels might well be increasing in the area, pollution is a big issue, oh yeah and so is congestion and yeah, our national party wants more active travel, but.....we are concerned if we allow it to go to design stage, that we might get a good design and we might actually have to annoy Mr and Mrs Angry and give it the go ahead....So, we'll bury our heads in the sand and hope it all blows over.</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
I think that just above covers the last two paragraphs.<br />
<br />
Actually I can summaries it with two words extracted from the e-mail<br />
<br />
<b>Political Will.</b><br />
<br />
Actually its quite unusual for a politician to admit that they just don't want to do it. No actual reason given, just that...nah...not for us, thanks. So we have a national party saying that active travel is a national policy and we have an MSP of that national party sending me a response that completely and utterly goes against national policy.<br />
<br />
Hello Transport Minister, are you reading this!?!?<br />
<br />
So, that's it then. Time to pack our bags, and give up on the lost cause that is East Dunbartonshire.....well, ....no. Quite the opposite.<br />
<br />
First off, if you live in East Dunbartonshire, contact your councillors and MSPs (of every party) and let them know that this is not acceptable. You can do that easily <a href="https://www.writetothem.com/">here</a>. It's time to find 'the political will'. I'm not just talking to you, the resident of East Dunbartonshire though. I'm talking to everyone else in Scotland. <a href="https://www.writetothem.com/">Contact your MSPs</a> and tell them that you are shocked by what you see happening in East Dunbartonshire. Let them know that you will not accept that attitude where you live.<br />
<br />
Finally, contact Humza Yousaf (his e-mail is scottish.ministers@gov.scot Just add FAO Humza Yousaf). I actually think Humza gets active travel and I'm excited by the national changes that are occurring, but if he has councillors and MSPs from his own party that are rebelling against national party policy, that needs to be dealt with, right?!<br />
<br />
Oh and you, yes you, cycling campaigns, cycling orgs etc. You don't get off scot-free either. It's time for you to make your voice heard as well. What do you think about this approach? Is it acceptable? Should we just abandon all hope in East Dunbartonshire, or will you help me lobby the council, and all the parties in the area to find this missing 'political will'?<br />
<br />
We sit on the edge of a great opportunity to truly take Scotland's transport system into the 21st century. However, if we sit back and expect politicians to make the leap, without being pushed, we will find ourselves falling back into the car dominated abyss. So take this stand with me. Let's help give our politicians the political will, to make East Dunbartonshire, and Scotland, cycle and people friendly.<br />
<br />magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-27371767530317158452017-10-30T23:23:00.000+00:002017-10-30T23:23:23.834+00:00Bear Way Extension? Not Likely!Here is a short e-mail trail between myself and my MSP Rona Mackay concerning the active travel discussion in Holyrood tomorrow (31st October some time ater 2pm), and the extension of Bears Way. I'll leave the e-mails here without further comment, unless you want to add your own....<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Dear Rona,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Following on from my questions on Twitter, I was wondering if you will </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
be attending the active travel debate on Tuesday at Holyrood?</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I am very concerned with the state of active travel in East </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Dunbartonshire. I have heard from very reliable sources, that the SNP in </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
the region do not want to consider extending the Bears Way cycle lane </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
past its current location. This is particularly concerning considering </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
recent data released demonstrating that the majority of cyclist </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
incidents (resulting in injury) occur in the area of phase 2.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
You can see the data for yourself at this link </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
(<a href="https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/collisions/#15/55.9223/-4.3139/opencyclemap">https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/collisions/#15/55.9223/-4.3139/opencyclemap</a>). </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Bears Way phase 1 was a great start, but on its own provides no </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
significant safety to those cycling through the area, as they still need </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
to cycle on the road in the most dangerous areas. The extension of Bears </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Way is absolutely vital to the area in which traffic congestion will </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
only serve to get worse with the new builds in the area. </blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I would be very grateful if you could attend the debate and address some </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
of these issue.</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br />
Reply from Rona:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Dear David,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Thanks for your email. I asked you to email as I prefer not to enter into constituent discussions on social media. I hope you understand and didn't want you to think I was ignoring you.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
To answer your question, I am not taking part in tomorrow's debate on Active Travel. I am speaking in another debate tomorrow which is more directly related to my work on the Justice Committee.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
With regard to Bears Way, I think you know my stated position - and that of the SNP group on EDC who voted to postpone the extension before the May election - that I am not in favour of extending it until the problems with Stage 1 have been addressed. How long this will take, and if indeed anything has been progressed on that front, I will have to ask the Council, which I am happy to do on your behalf.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I am fully supportive of Active Travel and I am happy that the Government is taking this forward as a priority throughout Scotland. However, I maintain my position that Bears Way is extremely badly designed and I do not believe it serves the best interests of cyclists, motorists or pedestrians.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I know it is unlikely you will agree with me on this, but I hope you respect my position.</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br />
My reply:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Hi Rona,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Many thanks for your reply. Of course I respect your position on this, </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
however I do wholeheartedly disagree with it. As someone who finds phase </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
1 Bears Way the safest and most enjoyable part of their commute, I find </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
it hard to understand what problems with phase 1 would justify a </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
moratorium on the design and implementation of phase 2, something that </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
the crash data demonstrate is desperately needed.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I would be the first, and probably was the first </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
(<a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2015/05/bears-way-heaven-or-hell.html">http://www.magnatom.net/2015/05/bears-way-heaven-or-hell.html</a> & </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2015/05/bears-way-not-for-everyone.html">http://www.magnatom.net/2015/05/bears-way-not-for-everyone.html</a>) to </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
criticise some aspects of Bears Way. It certainly isn't perfect. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
However, it is far superior to what was there before. As I have ridden </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
on it over time, and seen others (including many children) riding on it, </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I have come to realise that despite its minor flaws, it is a huge </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
benefit to those who use it and who could potentially use it, if it was </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
finished.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Just recently the Cycle Embassy of Great Britain, a well respected UK </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
wide campaign group, rode on the lane and gave it its approval </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
(<a href="https://www.cycling-embassy.org.uk/blog/2017/10/13/a-glasgow-excursion-the-cycling-embassy-agms-third-infrastructure-safari">https://www.cycling-embassy.org.uk/blog/2017/10/13/a-glasgow-excursion-the-cycling-embassy-agms-third-infrastructure-safari</a>).</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Considering that the overwhelming majority of the cycling community </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
support the extension of the cycle lane (I could provide a list of </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
organisations if you require it), could you please list for me what </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
issues that the EDC SNP group have with phase 1? Also, if the resolution </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
of the issues on phase 1 are all that is holding up phase 2, can I ask </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
what work your councillors have been conducting, and what internal </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
communications they have been making on behalf of constituents to </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
resolve these issues? I have seen a lot of public discussion with </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
regards to the shared space on Kirkintilloch (which I might add, I am </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
not a huge fan of), but absolutely nothing with regards to progressing </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Bears Way.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
</blockquote>
magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-44614351187103035952017-05-03T13:23:00.001+01:002017-05-03T13:51:27.656+01:00The Mind of a Candidate You Shouldn't Vote ForAt the very recent, and <a href="http://pedalonparliament.org/pop-goes-large-in-glasgow/">VERY successful PoP Glasgow demonstration</a>, I took advantage of my position as the M.C at George Square to give a wee speech (haven't found a video of it, does anyone have one?). The thrust of the speech was that, this being council elections, we should vote for local issues, not national issues. For example, it doesn't matter one iota if a candidate supports independence or not, they only get the same say on that issue that we all do!<br />
<br />
Vote on local issues!<br />
<br />
I also recounted a comment someone had made to me recently where they said:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>You can't base your vote on a cycle lane, surely?</i></blockquote>
<br />
They were referring to the fact that I was going to be basing my vote on the approach that councilors had to the Bears Way cycle lane.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>But its only a cycle lane!!</i></blockquote>
This was the response I gave in my PoP speech.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>But what he didn't understand was that it isn't about the cycle lane at all. It's about so much more. It's about pollution. It's about health. It's about the environment. It's about efficiency use of space. Is about providing our children with independence. It's about eradicating congestion. It's about appropriate use of land space. It's about reducing transport deprivation. It's about people friendly towns and cities. It's about places...</i></blockquote>
<br />
To expand on that... The facts behind investment in cycle infrastructure are overwhelming. Investing in cycle infrastructure pays back significantly in so many ways, too many ways for me to try and reference in a short blog.<br />
<br />
<b>Investing in cycling is a no-brainer!</b><br />
<br />
So, when I look at my what my candidates have said in relation to Bears Way, it isn't just telling me what they think about a cycle lane, it is telling me if they are someone who bases their decisions on fact, on research, and on logic.<br />
<br />
If a candidate is saying that they support cycling, but is suggesting that you do that by looking for wiggly back routes, and plotting them on a map, whilst pandering to the whims of Mr and Mr Angry who don't like segregated cycle lanes, as it means they have to drive a few MPH slower, then...well... that's obviously the way they will conduct future council business.<br />
<br />
In East Dunbartonshire one party in particular has made their opinions on segregated infrastructure very clear. The SNP. I critique their election propaganda on it <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2017/04/anger-will-make-me-pop.html">here</a>.<br />
<br />
Two other parties have also made their thoughts clear on the Bears Way. Both Labour and the Greens have stated quite clearly that they support extension of Bears Way along with proper design of the next phases.<br />
<br />
Last week I also contacted the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrat candidates in the area, asking them if they would support the extension of Bears Way. I haven't heard back. Going on past record, the conservatives had previously supported extending it, and the Liberal Democrats voted to stop it being extended. The lack of response from both might or might not speak volumes...<br />
<br />
I also personally contacted a local independent candidate in my area (Bishopbriggs North and Campsie) Brian Reid. His comments were very reasonable with regards to issues that the council have with forward planning, and he stated:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>I do believe that any extension of cycle ways should be a priority for our council.</i></blockquote>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: ,; font-size: 16px;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Am I telling you how to vote? Absolutely not. These issues may for you, be only one of many that you will be considering. However, as I've mentioned, consider the candidates approach to something that can only be a good thing, and you might have just seen...</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
....the Mind of a Candidate You Shouldn't Vote For......*<br />
<br />
<br />
*Actually you should vote for them....For them all....In an Standard Transferable Vote system you can actually vote against people by scoring them last. It's called <a href="https://weegingerdug.wordpress.com/2017/04/11/vote-until-you-boak/">Vote Till You Boke</a>. **<br />
<br />
** Oh and look at <a href="http://walkcyclevote.scot/">http://walkcyclevote.scot/</a> to see if your candidate supports three important asks.<br />
<br /></div>
magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-73037139534524591212017-04-21T17:00:00.000+01:002017-04-21T19:09:41.806+01:00Anger Will Make me PoPIt's here! It's <a href="http://pedalonparliament.org/">Pedal on Parliament</a> weekend! I hope you're coming! (Yes that's three sentences with three exclamation marks! Opps another one....)<br />
<br />
I feel in a exclamation mark sort of mood, I must admit, as I've just read something online that has made me angry.<br />
<br />
Very angry.<br />
<br />
This is probably good timing though. Being angry about what a prospective councillor in my area has said, the day before PoP Weekend (oh, should we use #popweekend on Twitter!?) is good, because I can calm down surrounded by thousands of like minded people.<br />
<br />
Anyway, what am I so worked up about? Well, a candidate for the SNP Denis Johnston has released a statement with the following headline:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Bears Way proposals would have an adverse impact on Bearsden</b></span></div>
<br />
<br />
Off to a great start there Denis!<br />
<br />
You can read it yourself <a href="https://edcsnp.scot/2017/04/21/bears-way-proposals-would-have-an-adverse-impact-in-bearsden/">here</a>.<br />
<br />
Below I'll go through it with comments. They might be a bit...angry.<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>ACTIVE and safe travel is a top concern for candidates in the upcoming East Dunbartonshire Council election.</i></blockquote>
Indeed it is. You are concerned about winning votes from Mr and Mrs Angry.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>The SNP is encouraging motorists to use other forms of transport, has secured an update to Active Travel Routes and is promoting rail halts across the local authority.</i></blockquote>
Ah the rail halt, the one which was scored <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2017/04/an-interesting-response.html">very poor value for money in a recent analysis</a>. <br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Denis Johnston, candidate for Bearsden South, said: “In East Dunbartonshire, the SNP group has a proud record of supporting policies and measures to get people across the whole local authority getting more active.</i></blockquote>
Umm...<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>“For example, the SNP secured a commitment from the Council to update all Active Travel Routes to schools, to encourage walking and cycling to school by identifying safe routes.</i></blockquote>
<br />
Ah. This is called the 'round the houses' policy. This involves looking at where people live, looking at where the school is, and drawing a really wiggly contorted line that goes on the quietest roads you can find. Spending consists of producing maps with the wiggly lines plotted out, giving the route a name (Wiggly Way?) and putting up some pretty coloured signs. Most importantly it inconveniences car drivers the least. <br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>“In addition, we are heavily involved in the modal shift agenda encouraging motorists to use other forms of transport and are promoting a new Allander Rail Halt with Park and Ride facilities to assist these changes.”</i></blockquote>
Ah more parking spaces at stations, which would actually increase traffic in the area, and once again, the really poor value for money rail halt. Public transport is an issue in the area. Now if we only had a decent bus service....<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>On the Bears Way, Denis added: “Many safety concerns have arisen after the first part of Bears Way was finished. For instance, worries at junctions and crossings. On the back of this, the SNP instigated a moratorium on the project pending a report on its safety.</i></blockquote>
Safety concerns! Wait!! Why weren't there any safety concerns about the utter, utter crap cycle lanes that were there before? Where was your (or your party's) concern then? As for safety, have you ridden it Denis? I'd be really interested to know. Did you ride it before the lane was built? I can assure you, 100%, that it is vastly safer than it was. That's why you now see kids and families riding on it, when you never did before. Sure the entrance and the exits are a bit rubbish, but....and here's the doozy.....that will only be resolved by extending it!! Oh wait, your party stopped that from happening...<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>“Looking ahead to the potential phase two, even more problems are leaping out, with the public questioning the complete lack of common sense in them.</i></blockquote>
A small proportion of the public whom the vast majority of which have probably never ridden a bike on a road in their lives. And what plans are their concerns based on? Well, there were some very basic proposals produced by the council, and they did some early traffic modelling. These were produced to get a feel for which proposals were preferred. There was no detail at all, just a number of options.<br />
<br />
In fact the preferred option had a good chance of improving the function of the junctions in the area. Yes there was uncertainty, which is why the council wanted to go to the detailed planning stage. You know, the stage were you actually have some plans to base decisions on. Yes, that stage that the SNP and Lib Dems stopped being produced by the moratorium you mentioned earlier....<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>“For example, the section that would go down Boclair Road. This road is very busy and there is absolutely no room to fit a large cycle path in at either side. Not to mention the chaos this would cause road users during the lengthy construction period.</i></blockquote>
That road is very busy. I know, I quite often drive up and down it. So does my wife. There are though, absolutely no plans whatsoever for the cycle lane to go down (or up as it is a 12% hill) Boclair Road. It will go past the bottom of it though.<br />
The council had a very innovative suggestion for how the Boclair junction could be improved (and would according to initial modelling actually improve it....). Had we gone to the detailed planning stage then we would have been able to make some proper decisions, but.....I think you know where I am going here.....the SNP and Lib Dems blocked the the detailed planning stage. So we are left with your, and Mr and Mrs Angry's hearsay.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>“The SNP overwhelmingly supports residents cycling, but rather across the whole of East Dunbartonshire, instead of one single route, which looks doomed to fail at significant cost to the public.”</i></blockquote>
Oh boy. Oooooh boy.<br />
<br />
Where exactly do you 'overwhelming support' residents (I suspect as someone who lives in East Dunbartonshire, but not in Bearsden, that I don't count as a resident....what about people from Glasgow, or elsewhere...?) cycling? On the back roads out of the way? Yup. On a main arterial route, which is a main arterial route....for the very reason.... that its the most efficient road to travel on from A to B, which unfortunately, and rather annoyingly for important people in cars, is where people want to travel on bikes... No.<br />
Mind you, you have a point. Cycling should be safe across the whole of East Dunbartonshire, not just along the A81, but this is where your argument falls down (well it sunk ages ago...). The A81 will hopefully be a part of a network. That network will consist of spokes. That is, arterial routes. These spokes will connect to other areas, some of which would have segregated lanes (which unfortunately might force drivers to keep to the speed limits) some would have 20mph speed limits (damn, speed limits again), filtered permeability, where some routes have to be closed to cars reducing rat running etc.<br />
For this whole plan to work, you need Bears Way. Then, you need another Bears Way, Then another, and then you look at all the other improvements that allow people to get to and from the spokes that take them to the places they want to go.<br />
<br />
This is how transport works!<br />
<br />
It cannot work without Bears Ways! Unless you have some new innovative way of making towns and cities cycle friendly, which the rest of the world has missed? Elevated cycle ways perhaps?<br />
<br />
As for 'doomed to fail, and 'significant cost the public'....Do you actually understand the huge costs to society that increased levels of driving, and the resulting pollution brings? Do you actually have a handle on the relative spend on cycling and walking compared to road building in this country? Do you understand the power of 4 relationship between road damage and axle weight which results in cars doing significant damage to the roads, where cyclists do practically none? Do you understand the societal costs to health of a sedentary lifestyle? Do you understand the cost of thousands of people being injured and killed by bad driving every year?!<br />
<br />
I'm going to hazard a guess.... no.<br />
<br />
And finally....'doomed'. Well, yes, it might be. Why? Not because there are any significant flaws in the project or the vision,....sure its not perfect, it needs tweaked here and there, oh and extended....... but because people like you don't listen to facts. You listen to Mr and Mr Angry and you think....hmmm, how can I get a few extra votes so that I can get elected to council? Honestly, that is how this comes across.<br />
<br />
Anyway, thanks for helping me write my short speech that I will be giving at PoP Glasgow. I honestly, seriously hope you will come and join us, so you can see what an 'adverse impact' really looks like. I think you'll find it looks like a people friendly Scotland.<br />
<br />
What I do ask, is that anyone who is reading this, who is a resident of East Dunbartonhsire, please seriously consider who you want to put a 1,2, or 3 against on the ballot papers...and seriously consider who you want to put the largest number against.....<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-24609878024495860452017-04-17T21:48:00.002+01:002017-04-17T21:48:39.665+01:00An Interesting Response<div class="tr_bq">
Two important events are approaching. The first (and arguably most important!) is Pedal on Parliament. </div>
<br />
<i>Och, that's old hat. Happens every year. Etc....</i><br />
<br />
Well no. This year there is a twist. This year there are four, yes 4.... FOUR PoPs. As usual Edinburgh, and Aberdeen, but this year we add Inverness, and personally exciting for me....Glasgow!<br />
<br />
Even better...due to the fact that Glasgow is on a different day (Sunday the 23rd April, the others are on the 22nd) you can attend two!<br />
<br />
I'll be in Edinburgh and Glasgow, where will you be!?<br />
<br />
The second important event is the local council elections (the main reason that we have spread to four cities!).<br />
<br />
In my opinion, council elections are very different from national (Holyrood and Westminster elections). You don't have to, and shouldn't be voting on national issues. You should vote for what politicians have done, and say they will do locally. Thus, you shouldn't necessarily vote for the same parties you vote for nationally.<br />
<br />
One place I think many should consider this is East Dunbartonshire.<br />
<br />
Anyone who reads this blog will know that the SNP, Lib Dems and some independents voted against the extension of Bearsway. Labour and the Conservatives voted for it. I've blogged on the vote and the issues quite often before (you can read it <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/10/bearsway-council-meeting.html">here</a>, <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/10/the-mind-of-anti-bearsway-councillor.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2017/03/two-fingers-to-bears-wsy.html">here</a>). In summary, the SNP led the vote against and had absolutely no reasonable argument to vote against it. In fact they weren't even voting on extending it, they were only voting on the council conducting detailed designs for the next phase.<br />
<br />
The whole thing was stopped.<br />
<br />
Anyway, on the run up to the elections I've been chasing the local SNP group for a statement on Bears Way, Would they support it? I've not been having much success and the only responses I've had had via Twitter have been poor. So I decided to contact Ian Mackay, as leader of the local SNP group. This is what I wrote.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Dear Ian, </i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>As leader of the SNP group in East Dunbartonshire can I please ask you to pass on the following message to your group. </i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Firstly, as an organiser of Pedal on Parliament (http://pedalonparliament.org/) can I please extend an invitation to all of the East Dunbartonshire candidates to come along to the demonstration in Glasgow on the 23rd April, calling for councils to make their areas cycling friendly. Humza Yousaf will be there giving a speech and I know that SNP councillors and candidates from Glasgow and the surrounding areas will be attending. Could you please let me know if you will be sending a representative. </i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Secondly, can I please ask for clarification on your parties stance on the Bears Way cycle lane. People on both sides of the argument deserve to know where you stand on the extension of the lane. </i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Many thanks. I look forward to your reply. </i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Best regards </i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Dr David Brennan</i></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br />
Now before you read the response, take note of<a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/2ddsumf2aca91t3/A81%20Transport%20Options%20Appraisal%20Study.pdf?dl=0"> this document</a>. It is a Transport Options Appraisal Study that was commissioned by the council and conducted by WSP Parsons Brinkerhoff. There is a lot to read, but in summary it looks at different investments in transport that could be made, and provides cost benefits analysis.<br />
<br />
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="MsoNormalTable" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: none; margin-left: 5.4pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-insideh: .5pt solid windowtext; mso-border-insidev: .5pt solid windowtext; mso-padding-alt: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-yfti-tbllook: 1184; width: 662px;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 102.8pt;" valign="top" width="137">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Option<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-left: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 96.85pt;" valign="top" width="129">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">BCR<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-left: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 103.15pt;" valign="top" width="138">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Scenario<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-left: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 193.35pt;" valign="top" width="258">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Methodology<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 102.8pt;" valign="top" width="137">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Do Minimum<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 96.85pt;" valign="top" width="129">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">10 Years - <b>0.59</b>, (Poor Value for money)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">20 Years - <b>0.91</b> (Poor Value for money)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 103.15pt;" valign="top" width="138">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">10 Years and 20
Years present Value<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 193.35pt;" valign="top" width="258">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">TRL593 GJT <a href="file:///C:/Users/David/Downloads/D&R%20Feb%2017%20Report%20-%20A81%20and%20LTS%20-%20TWG%20(2).doc#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1" title=""><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><!--[if !supportFootnotes]--><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">[1]</span></span><!--[endif]--></span></a>elasticities,
estimated journey time savings and average fares per journey. Non-user
benefits are assessed using WebTAG<a href="file:///C:/Users/David/Downloads/D&R%20Feb%2017%20Report%20-%20A81%20and%20LTS%20-%20TWG%20(2).doc#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2" title=""><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><!--[if !supportFootnotes]--><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">[2]</span></span><!--[endif]--></span></a></span><span lang="EN-GB"> </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">methodology.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">% journey time saving estimate derived from
results of commercial systems published on the SCOOT <a href="file:///C:/Users/David/Downloads/D&R%20Feb%2017%20Report%20-%20A81%20and%20LTS%20-%20TWG%20(2).doc#_ftn3" name="_ftnref3" title=""><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><!--[if !supportFootnotes]--><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">[3]</span></span><!--[endif]--></span></a>website.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 102.8pt;" valign="top" width="137">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Extension Milngavie Car Park <o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 96.85pt;" valign="top" width="129">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">3.04</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> (High Value for money)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 103.15pt;" valign="top" width="138">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Increasing car
parking 134 spaces to 240<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 193.35pt;" valign="top" width="258">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Park and Ride
Demand Model. Details in Study Appendix.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 102.8pt;" valign="top" width="137">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Extension of Bears Way<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 96.85pt;" valign="top" width="129">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">3.98</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> (High Value for money)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">4.43</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">(Very high Value for money)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 103.15pt;" valign="top" width="138">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Phase 3 only (5%
Background Growth)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Phases 2 and 3
(5% Background Growth)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 193.35pt;" valign="top" width="258">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">AMAT<a href="file:///C:/Users/David/Downloads/D&R%20Feb%2017%20Report%20-%20A81%20and%20LTS%20-%20TWG%20(2).doc#_ftn4" name="_ftnref4" title=""><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><!--[if !supportFootnotes]--><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">[4]</span></span><!--[endif]--></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Assessed
utilising WebTAG Databook (Spring 2016 release v1.6)6. <a href="file:///C:/Users/David/Downloads/D&R%20Feb%2017%20Report%20-%20A81%20and%20LTS%20-%20TWG%20(2).doc#_ftn5" name="_ftnref5" title=""><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><!--[if !supportFootnotes]--><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">[5]</span></span><!--[endif]--></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 102.8pt;" valign="top" width="137">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Do Something (Combined) <o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 96.85pt;" valign="top" width="129">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">3.05</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> (High Value for money)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 103.15pt;" valign="top" width="138">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Extension of
Milngavie car park and extension of Bears Way Phases 2 and 3. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 193.35pt;" valign="top" width="258">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Park and Ride
Model and AMAT.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 102.8pt;" valign="top" width="137">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">New Allander Railway Station (Single track)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 96.85pt;" valign="top" width="129">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">0.76</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> (Poor value for money)<b><o:p></o:p></b></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 103.15pt;" valign="top" width="138">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">150 Space Car
Park<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 193.35pt;" valign="top" width="258">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Bespoke demand
forecasting and appraisal tool.<a href="file:///C:/Users/David/Downloads/D&R%20Feb%2017%20Report%20-%20A81%20and%20LTS%20-%20TWG%20(2).doc#_ftn6" name="_ftnref6" title=""><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><!--[if !supportFootnotes]--><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">[6]</span></span><!--[endif]--></span></a>
<a href="file:///C:/Users/David/Downloads/D&R%20Feb%2017%20Report%20-%20A81%20and%20LTS%20-%20TWG%20(2).doc#_ftn7" name="_ftnref7" title=""><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><!--[if !supportFootnotes]--><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">[7]</span></span><!--[endif]--></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 102.8pt;" valign="top" width="137">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">New Allander Railway station (Single track)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 96.85pt;" valign="top" width="129">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">1.17 </span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">(Low value for money)<b> <o:p></o:p></b></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 103.15pt;" valign="top" width="138">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">550 Space car
park<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 193.35pt;" valign="top" width="258">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Bespoke demand
forecasting and appraisal tool.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 102.8pt;" valign="top" width="137"><div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">New Allander Railway station</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">(Double Track)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 96.85pt;" valign="top" width="129">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">0.44 </span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">(Poor value for money)<b><o:p></o:p></b></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 103.15pt;" valign="top" width="138">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">150 Space Car
Park<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 193.35pt;" valign="top" width="258">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Bespoke demand
forecasting and appraisal tool.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top: none; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 102.8pt;" valign="top" width="137"><div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">New Allander Railway station</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">(Double Track)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 96.85pt;" valign="top" width="129">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">0.73 </span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">(Poor value for money)<b><o:p></o:p></b></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 103.15pt;" valign="top" width="138">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">550 Space car
park<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; width: 193.35pt;" valign="top" width="258">
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Bespoke demand
forecasting and appraisal tool.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<div>
<div id="ftn1">
<div class="MsoFootnoteText">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoFootnoteText">
All you really need to note is that Bears Way extension scored very highly for value for money, and the new Allander railway halt, scored poorly. Now, read the reply...</div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<blockquote>
Thank you for your e mail of 13 April regarding the Pedal on Parliament event on 23 April.<br />Regarding the SNP stance on the Bearsway I would refer you to the decision of the Council on 27 September 2016. I have copied this below.<br /><br />a) to note the Report and the review of Phase 1 and approves proposed<br />improvements bullet points 1 and 2 as detailed in 5.13, page 206, and instructs<br />Officers to report back to Council on the full implications and costs of bullet<br />points 3 and 4. The Report would include a full and meaningful public<br />consultation with all Community Councils in Bearsden and Milngavie, all<br />Residents’ Associations, bus operators, Strathclyde Partnership for Transport<br />and disability groups:<br />b) to note the options available for the continuation of the Bears Way following<br />the modelling exercise and the feedback from the recent consultation exercise;<br />c) not to proceed with any of the Phase 2 options;<br />d) to take note of all elements of public consultation and all comments received<br />from members of the community;<br />e) to note the recently organised and submitted petition by Mrs Aileen McIntyre<br />on change.org that contained 2600 signatures, and numerous comments<br />regarding Bears Way; and<br />f) that any future works associated with Phase 1, or any subsequent works, must<br />Include the protection of residential, commercial and commuter parking.<br /><br />Bearing this decision in mind we have serious concerns about the safety of the current design particularly at road junctions and crossings. We instigated a moratorium on the project until these concerns are addressed and are awaiting a Council report into the problems with the design of Phase 1. It should also be noted that with the development of the Kilmardinny/ Westpark site just started we still have to assess the impact of the additional access roads to the A81 which will inevitably adjust the scheme already constructed. With regard to the proposed phase 2 from Hillfoot to Kessington we cannot see how the current proposals can work without causing an adverse impact for other road users, particularly at the Boclair Road and Asda junctions.<br />The SNP group supports the Scottish Governments Active Travel Strategy. We recently secured a commitment from the Council to update all Active Travel Routes to Schools. This is to encourage walking, cycling or scooting to school by identifying safe routes. In addition we are heavily involved in the modal shift agenda encouraging motorists to use other forms of transport and are promoting a new Allander Rail Halt with Park and Ride facilities to assist these changes.<br />Best Regards<br />Ian </blockquote>
Let's quickly list the issues.<br />
<br />
<br />
<ol>
<li>He quotes the outcome of the council meeting. The one he knows I was at, and that I wrote about extensively. Very nice for him to reiterate the outcome.</li>
<li>He suggests that phase 1 wasn't safe (it is, and any issues could have been corrected, but was stopped by the moratorium). I'd be interested to know what experts they have consulted on this.</li>
<li>He suggests that he is waiting for a report. I've checked, and the people I spoke to (in the know) suggest that there is no report coming. What report is this?! I've asked.</li>
<li>He has suggested that phase 2 wouldn't work. We don't know that, specifically because the moratorium stopped the very detailed planning that would have told us.</li>
<li>Well, he says he is supporting SNP policy....I'll let you decide....</li>
<li>And yes,....he is promoting the very things that a report commissioned by the council has already demonstrated that would be of the poorest value.</li>
<li>Oh and he has ignored my invite.</li>
</ol>
<div>
<br /></div>
<br />
Phew!<br />
<br />
So the best word I can think of that describes the local SNP response (and I stress local, because very good words are coming from SNP Glasgow) is ....Omnishambles. (Actually I can think of a better word, but it's a tad rude).<br />
<br />
East Dunbartonshire SNP policy is a mess with regards to active travel. Can you really trust these same people with anything else?!<br />
<br />
So what can we do?<br />
<br />
Vote, and vote intelligently. Vote on local issues, not national. Don't vote because you like or don't like independence. Don't vote because you like or dislike Jeremy Corbyn.<br />
<br />
Vote for the right people for the area. For its future. For a more progressive east Dunbartonshire.<br />
<br />
Oh and just in case I haven't mentioned it. Come to PoP. If you are in Glasgow, or in a surrounding area, come on the 23rd. The Transport Minister will be there. Be friendly, but be firm. Let's leave everyone in no doubt that we demand a cycle friendly Scotland.magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-3316019572298739412017-03-18T12:49:00.000+00:002017-03-18T12:49:49.594+00:00Two Fingers to Bears WsyYou may have read my recent letter to my local SNP councillor. If not, why not! <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2017/03/a-letter-to-anne-again.html">Go read it here now!</a> It explains that there was to be a meeting on the 16th March where Labour were to ask for a discussion on the petition to extend Bears Way.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately I wasn't able to make the meeting myself, but a very trustworthy, quietly campaigning friend was able to go along to witness events. In his message to me after the meeting, his first words were:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Well that was a shambles!</i></blockquote>
<br />
Was the content of the petition discussed? No.<br />
<br />
Was the advantages (which are significant) and the disadvantages (which are mostly factitious) of extending Bears Way discussed? No.<br />
<br />
Was there any discussion of the incident where tacks were placed on the cycle lane? No.<br />
<br />
No, the greatest concern of the opposition councillors, led by Cllr Keith Small of the SNP, were....<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Where do the people live who signed the petition?!?</i></blockquote>
Yes dear readers, we have entered the primary school playground.<br />
<br />
And so it apparently continued. With Cllr Ian McKay (SNP) suggesting that there should be a breakdown of the the areas where the petitioners lived, to shouts of ludicrous from those in other parties (almost certainly not the Lib Dems though, as they too are opposed to the extension). Ludicrous because, well.....did anyone ask the same question about the petition that asked for the Bears Way to be scrapped? Well, of course not. Sanity descended for a short while, when it was decided that that would be a waste of council time.<br />
<br />
Cllr Duncan Cumming (Ind) wanted to speak about petitions in general, but apparently spat his dummy out (not my words!) when it was pointed out he had already spoken and should give others an opportunity. To be fair....at the council meeting I attended previously (<a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/10/bearsway-council-meeting.html">which is well worth a read</a>) Cllr Cumming spat his dummy out then, so I tend to believe this description.<br />
<br />
Then came the curve ball..... In an attempt to raise the condescending level to warp factor 10, Cllr Keith Small moved an amendment, that a copy of the original decision be sent to the chap who started the petition. Yes, in a move that can metaphorically be described as giving those in favour of the extension 'two fingers' whilst blowing a raspberry, Cllr Small made it quite clear what he thought.<br />
<br />
As far as I am aware that amendment was passed.<br />
<br />
Yup......primary school playground.<br />
<br />
These people are your elected representatives. These are the people who are supposed to be working in the best interests of the area, and its constituents. This is the same SNP who have a national policy of investing in active travel schemes and of having 10% modal share of cycling by 2020. This is the same SNP who in Glasgow have just announced that they will be investing 10% of the transport budget in active travel. This is the same SNP who's transport minister I spoke to earlier this week and who is wanting to do more towards active travel.<br />
<br />
It would appear that we were wrong in declaring the dinosaurs extinct. The dinosaurs are alive and well in East Dunbartonshire, and these dinosaurs are a problem that the SNP will have to solve quickly if it doesn't want to loose support in the area.<br />
<br />magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-51676382469389343972017-03-14T18:22:00.000+00:002017-03-14T18:22:42.241+00:00A Letter to Anne - Again<div class="MsoNormal">
As some of you may have read previously I <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/09/my-letter-to-anne.html">wrote a letter to my SNP council representative</a>. I wrote this after she voted against extending Bears Way. I also <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/10/the-mind-of-anti-bearsway-councillor.html">met up with her to discuss this</a> when I didn't get a response. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Now that we have submitted a petition to the council asking for the lane to be extended, signed by nearly 3000 people, the council are considering it at their next meeting. Labour are putting forward a motion to have the 'standing order' dropped that prevents any further work on the lane. Thus I have written to Anne once more asking that she consider voting to have the standing orders dropped. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
If you live in East Dunbartonshire I suggest you write to your councillors to. <a href="https://www.writetothem.com/">You can do so here</a>.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Is the local SNP really as progressive as they suggest they are?</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />
<blockquote>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "merriweather" , "georgia" , "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 16px;">Dear Anne McNair</span> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "merriweather" , "georgia" , "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 16px;">It is my understanding that the council will be considering the petition to extend the Bears Way cycle lane at this week’s full council meeting. I also understand that Labour will be proposing that the ‘standing orders’ are suspended, so that detailed planning work on phase 2 of Bears Way could recommence or at the very least be considered again.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "merriweather" , "georgia" , "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 16px;">I should stress, as we discussed when I met you, that suspending these orders and allowing the detailed planning to progress does not commit the council to building phase 2. This would only provide you and the rest of the council with the information you need to base a properly informed decision on. I am sure that you understand the need for informed choices, just as Nicola Sturgeon discussed in her speech yesterday, on the need for a second independence referendum.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "merriweather" , "georgia" , "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 16px;">I will be meeting with Transport Minister Humza Yousaf tomorrow as a representative of Pedal on Parliament. I will be congratulating him on the commitment made by the SNP council in Glasgow in their upcoming manifesto to set 10% of the transport budget on active travel. I will though be stressing that as things stand, East Dunbartonshire is bucking this progressive trend.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "merriweather" , "georgia" , "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 16px;">On Thursday evening you have the opportunity to demonstrate that local SNP is as progressive in transport policy as the SNP are in Glasgow, that the future of East Dunbartonshire matters more than the vagaries of local politics, and that you truly believe in making East Dunbartonshire a people friendly region.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "merriweather" , "georgia" , "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 16px;">Please demonstrate that Scotland can be, and is progressive, as I believe that this is why many people are considering voting for independence.</span></blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote>
Yours Sincerely</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
David Brennan</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-51117167964029174402017-02-01T17:09:00.002+00:002017-02-01T17:09:44.936+00:00Dear Outraged...Dear Outraged of Milngavie and Bearsden,<br />
<br />
You are correct. I apologise. The Bears Way cycle lane has caused you chaos. I know this because I see it every morning. For example...<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/igED6WzjUqw" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
Horrific. Never mind that though. It is even worse at night! Egads!<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vt8kVo-Bo0Q" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
I've come to realise that you are right. It's time to widen that road. I think we need dual carriageway as that works really, really well at reducing congestion as this road a little further down the road demonstrates...<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/yz6K47OsZfg" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
So yes, no more extension to the Bears Way cycle lane please. <br />
<br />
The future is bright. The future is motorised!<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tGIvOeBlXB4" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
Yours sincerely,<br />
<br />
The Ministry of Alternative Facts<br />
<br />
<br />magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-22371063907318286912017-01-05T20:11:00.001+00:002017-01-05T21:01:18.003+00:00Humble Pie and Downright Lie?I have an apology to make. Quite a significant one. One of my previous blogs was entirely mis-representative. <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/09/failed-by-police.html">This one</a>. Even the title, "Failed by the police" is completely wrong. I was not failed by the police.<br />
<br />
Thus, I would like to apologise unreservedly to Police Scotland and to the police officers that I anonymously implicated. I am sorry.<br />
<br />
Police Scotland did not mess up on this occasion. That was completely false. My accusation, which was based on a conversation I had with a Procurator Fiscal, was that the police had messed up their procedures and hadn't applied a section 172, which requires a driver to identify him or herself when requested by the police.<br />
<br />
There was no issue with the 172. Let me explain.<br />
<br />
As I discussed in the above linked blog, I attended court for an incident where a van driver had (in my educated opinion) swerved his vehicle at me, whilst hitting his horn in anger. This forced me to swerve into another lane, which was fortunately empty. Here is the video.<br />
<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/89AP83T5WE4" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
I think you will agree that this was a seriously bad piece of driving.<br />
<br />
The case finally went to court and whilst I sat in the witness room waiting for the case to be called, I was taken outside by the procurator fiscal (PF) who told me that there was a problem. The problem was apparently with the section 172. It hadn't been applied correctly. This meant that the defence would be able to have the case dismissed on the ground of not being able to 'legally' identify the driver. More details are in <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/09/failed-by-police.html">this blog</a>. The PF told me that if the case went ahead it would fail, and I would have wasted my time. The PF then asked me what I wanted to do....<br />
<br />
That bit was a bit strange, and only in hindsight does this make sense. Well, actually, even then it doesn't. Why ask me what I want to do? Anyway I agreed that if there was no prospect of prosecution, that there was no point. So I agreed that the case should be dropped.<br />
<br />
I then went home, angry with the police, and wrote <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/09/failed-by-police.html">the angry blog</a>.<br />
<br />
But....<br />
<br />
I wanted to make a formal complaint so I started writing that. At the same time I spoke to Herald reporter (Helen McArdale) who at the time was transport correspondent. She took an interest and suggested that she would do her own investigating. I left her to it, expecting to have my story confirmed.<br />
<br />
Then I got an interesting reply from Helen.<br />
<br />
The police got back to Helen and categorically denied that there was any issue with the section 172. They suggested that the section 172 had no bearing on the case being dropped.<br />
<br />
Strange. Very strange. I expected that the PF would counter that suggestion. I expected that there was some form of miscommunication and that there was indeed a problem with the 172. It turns out they didn't and there wasn't.<br />
<br />
This was the quote from the PF that came shortly afterwards via Helen.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
.... the Section 172 had "no bearing" on the decision to drop proceedings in this case - .....the issue of establishing the identity of the driver wasn't an issue and he had provided details. The decision to drop the case was down to "other factors" and not related to any problems on the police side.</blockquote>
<br />
What!? Seriously!?!<br />
<br />
I'll just re-iterate the following:<br />
<br />
The PF (young lady) who took me out of the witness room was quite clear that the issue in the case was down to the section 172. In fact I remember seeing the notes in front of her and it had a 'post it' note on the notes for my case. It clearly said 's.172' on it. She specifically took me outside the witness room to discuss this, and told me that on this basis she <i>could</i> proceed with the case, but that as soon as the prosecution stood up they would call for the trial to be stopped. They would highlight the issue with the section 172 and the Magistrate would have no option but to drop the case. She pointed out that it could proceed, but would ultimately fail, and thus wasn't worth it for the strain I would be put through (she pointed out that they knew I posted on YouTube and that this would probably be used against me). On this basis she asked me.... <i>did I wan't to proceed?</i> I thought that this was a little unusual, to be asked this, but thought she was just being nice, as the only obvious answer was.... not to proceed. I left very angry, as you can imagine.<br />
<br />
I was angry then, having heard the PF's latest response I was furious!!<br />
<br />
Oh and one more thing.....The Sheriff court suggested that the accused was absent from court that day.<br />
<br />
WTF!!?<br />
<br />
I had to get to the bottom of this. Helen had helped me all she could (and I am grateful for that help!), but had two options;<br />
<br />
A direct complaint,<br />
<br />
and a<br />
<br />
'Subject Access Request'.<br />
<br />
The direct complaint is self explanatory and here is what I sent:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I was recently a witness in a case against xxxx xxxxx. On the 28th September I attended court.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Whilst I was there I was called outside by the Procurator Fiscal working on the case. She told me that unfortunately, due to a police error, the case was unwinnable. She pointed out that the police failed to process a section 172, and thus the identity of the driver, whilst know, could not be proven in court. She then suggested that the case could go ahead however, as soon as the defence lawyer stood up, he/she would call for the case to be dismissed on these grounds and would succeed. She then asked if I wanted to proceed. She pointed out that if I did, it would not be a nice experience as the defence lawyer knew I posted videos on Youtube and would use these against me.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I decided, based on this information to allow her to drop the case. I commented that there was no point wasting my time on something that can't succeed as I have a lot of work to do. She then made a comment about having lots of other cases to prosecute that day. She seemed relieved. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Since that day the Glasgow Herald has taken an interest. After contacting the police, yourselves and the Sheriff Court she has ascertained;</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<ul>
<li> There were no issues with a section 172. Both the PF and police have confirmed this.</li>
<li> There were no issues in identifying the accused for the purposes of the trial.</li>
<li> The accused apparently was absent on the day of the trial. The local Sheriff has confirmed this.</li>
<li> The PF now list the case as being dropped for 'other reasons'</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Understandably, I am very concerned by this, as I only agreed not to proceed (I was surprised at being asked!) due to the particular issue surrounding the S.172. In fact I explicitly remember seeing a sticky note on her notes with S.172 written on it. There is no way otherwise I would have agreed to drop this case.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Therefore, please can you provide full details of why the case against xxxx was dropped. Why was I told by the PF that there was an issue with S.172 when there wasn't? Was xxxxxx absence allowed or did he break the terms of his summons? If so, has he been charged for this?</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I look forward to your reply with interest.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Best regards</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Dr David Brennan</blockquote>
</blockquote>
The <a href="https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/principle-6-rights/subject-access-request/">subject access request</a> is a process by which a member of the public (i.e. me) can ask a body such as the PF to share any information they hold about that person (i.e. me). I therefore e-mailed the PF at the specific 'Subject Access Request' address and asked for information held about me, related to this particular case.<br />
<br />
I received an instant reply that I would hear in 40 calendar days or less.<br />
<br />
Some time later I received a reply in relation to my complaint. Here is a picture of the reply.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTmXxuLh7mcKWKgDWbGfjWYEg4_V_czuZpsX0E_pn1C1IWL4VHxlLZvhk9Hd7_f1V8vIFCXpEBlDYlJ93zhJQUlnLG-A-quhCMnZPABrtjy5tKPb8gbrPZvSG9_cWsAWZQZAqP4iCU7xA7/s1600/PF_reply1+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTmXxuLh7mcKWKgDWbGfjWYEg4_V_czuZpsX0E_pn1C1IWL4VHxlLZvhk9Hd7_f1V8vIFCXpEBlDYlJ93zhJQUlnLG-A-quhCMnZPABrtjy5tKPb8gbrPZvSG9_cWsAWZQZAqP4iCU7xA7/s640/PF_reply1+%25281%2529.jpg" width="494" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjn_XdljKOfWEXkO_-3H2WMGmR3jOClVARcJcV9OugzivnGLhhTYPHtME7lnF9jfWw8SJcFAtsCjFawBP0pEPEtCX48rBbrv_UtqLsiWgbApXJvIgwSvlk48lWBn811NbgLtcW0ekq5mSh6/s1600/PF_reply2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjn_XdljKOfWEXkO_-3H2WMGmR3jOClVARcJcV9OugzivnGLhhTYPHtME7lnF9jfWw8SJcFAtsCjFawBP0pEPEtCX48rBbrv_UtqLsiWgbApXJvIgwSvlk48lWBn811NbgLtcW0ekq5mSh6/s640/PF_reply2.jpg" width="492" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
So...The Procurator Fiscal was in <i>error</i>.<br />
<br />
<b>Error.</b><br />
<br />
Well, when you tell....and the following is my opinion I should stress....an untruth, a fabrication, a.....lie....then yes an error was made. A very serious error. An error of judgement that this fabrication would not be questioned. That someone, be it this particular PF or a colleague who suggested this course of action, made an error in deciding to deceive, because...... they were a bit busy that day and this was an easy case for them to get rid of.<br />
<br />
Is it possible that my opinion of what has happened here is is wrong? Is it possible that a genuine mistake was made? Is it possible that someone might accidentally think that the section 172 had an issue when it didn't? I seriously, seriously doubt it. Even the procurator fiscal here suggests that a decision was made, at some point which is uncertain (probably when the PF felt a bit busy and decided to chat with me...), that this case was not in the public interest. They imply that the decision was taken before the PF came to speak to me.<br />
<br />
Hmm.<br />
<br />
Very confusing.<br />
<br />
If that was the case, if the PF really had decided that the case was not in the 'public's interest' why did the PF suggest the 172 problem? Why give me an option to proceed or not? The PF in the letter doesn't even refute my recollection of events. They appear to agree that that section 172 was mentioned.<br />
<br />
Let's take a trip to cloud cookoo land, and imagine that it was a genuine mistake. Even if that was the case...In what way was this case not in the public interest? Is it now reasonable to expect drivers swerving at you in (my opinion), obvious anger when you are riding a bike? That's just life, is it? Any why wait until the case comes to court, thus completely wasting my time? And I'm not really buying the whole, well, the defendant didn't have to show up excuse!<br />
<br />
Oh and notice, if I want to phone them to chat about this, I need to pay 7 pence per minute. Yes I need to pay them to discuss being lied to by them (in my opinion!).<br />
<br />
So what has come of the Subject Access Request?....I hear you ask.<br />
<br />
Well, I waited 40 days. I chased. I waited 80 days. I waited 92 days. I chased. I eventually got a reply saying that the complaint reply above, covered the Subject Access Request. It does not. Their response has not provided me with all the information they hold about me in this case. It only responds to my complaint, so I am still waiting....<br />
<br />
I have chased this and well,.....perhaps they will eventually get back, but I gave up waiting and decided to write this blog. I will continue to chase and when I eventually get the information I require and am entitled to, I will then use that information to complain further.<br />
<br />
Yes the PF is snowed under. Yes they are almost certainly understaffed. Yes I sympathise. But all sympathy from me was lost the minute....in my and perhaps your opinion....I was lied to.<br />
<br />
More on this when I know more....<br />
<br />
<br />magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-47975369992258037532016-12-09T20:36:00.000+00:002016-12-09T20:36:27.363+00:00Accusing the VictimA lot has happened to me recently. You'll know from previous stories and blogs that I've had <a href="http://road.cc/content/news/153860-helmetcam-user-and-cycling-campaigner-targeted-drawing-pins-sprinkled-drive">tacks placed at the end of my path</a>. I've had <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/05/sticks-and-stones.html">stones thrown at my house and car</a>. Recently a letter was sent to my neighbours suggesting that if I don't stop reporting drivers to the police that thugs would vandalise the area and perhaps poison local animals<br />
<br />
You can read it in this tweet.<br />
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<div dir="ltr" lang="en">
Here is the letter that a number of my neighbours received earlier this week. If you have any info about this, please let me know. <a href="https://t.co/3sR56FBjim">pic.twitter.com/3sR56FBjim</a></div>
— David Brennan (@magnatom) <a href="https://twitter.com/magnatom/status/802213245943746560">November 25, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async="" charset="utf-8" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>
So, please excuse me a little, that when I get an egg thrown at me a few days ago and I post about it on Facebook, that I get a little angry with one particular woman who, rather than demonstrate any anger at the incident itself or concern from me, gets angry at me for thinking the egg was thrown from a particular unidentified car.<br />
<br />
<br />
<iframe allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="537" scrolling="no" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fbearswayfriends%2Fposts%2F1849690088648034&width=500" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" width="500"></iframe><br />
<br />
Here is the text of this particular conversation, just in case it should disappear.....<br />
<br />
Laura D:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Watched the video and i have no idea why you think is acceptable to blame one particular car without knowing for sure. I would be absolutely raging if I had innocently driven passed you as this incident happened to later find a photo of my car on the Internet and the finger being pointed to me.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Whatever happen to innocent until proven guilty?</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"this is the vehicle the egg was thrown from"</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Where is the proof?</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Shocking accusation from a so called health professional</blockquote>
</blockquote>
My reply:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Have you read what I've written above? The bit where I say I have no proof. The bit where I say keep an eye out? Exactly where have I shared anything apart from a make of vehicle? Is that identifying in any way? Which other vehicle exactly could this have come from? Possible from the houses? Perhaps, but incredibly unlikely due to speed and angle that it hit me, and lack of any images of anything untoward on the video. Most importantly where have I accused any person of being guilty? </blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Oh and thanks for your concern. I'm fine thanks</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
</blockquote>
Laura D:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Don't be flippant with me, this post isn't about how you are, it's a post trying to identify a car, on a road where there are many cars and also houses, like you've said. </blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Yes I've read your comments, but those were made after you had originally posted this and advert others had put their valid points over. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
You are not always in the right,although it appears that you think you are. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Other people are allowed their opinions, that's what happens when you create blogs,or Facebook accounts, we are allowed to say what we think, just like you are. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
And that's what I'm doing here. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Have you ever thought of a career change, clearly you think you should be part of police Scotland. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I have never had any issues with cyclists on the road, being a horse rider and being on the roads myself i know exactly what is like. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
But your tone, your attitude and your false accusations are giving other cyclists a bad name. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I just pray.i never pass you and accidently sneeze, or look at you the wrong way or ill end up players ask over the Internet. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Your very bizzare</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br />
My reply:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Hi Laura, I am writing this from my own account, just to be sure there isn't any misunderstanding about who is writing it. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I can assure you, in my reply I was not being flippant. In fact I was being quite serious. I was pointing you in the direction of the comments above, where one poster had commented on my claim, and I agreed that perhaps it had been strongly worded, and thus I corrected it. The tweet itself, in which I did state that it was 'definitely from the car', was an initial reaction to viewing the video. You'll notice that posters above comment that they can't see the link. The reason they and you can't link to it is because I deleted it.<br />
Now, remember I posted this that evening having got in, and having had an egg thrown at me (quite hard I might add, it stung quite a bit). So that was my initial response. I corrected it without any issue. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Remember also I have recently had a letter sent to my neighbours which has been threatening, that I have had bricks thrown at my house and car, and tacks left at the end of my path. All things considered, I think I was rather restrained. Despite all of this you come onto the thread and without any comment about the incident itself, or about how wrong it is, started accusing me of being unprofessional. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
In fact it is of particular interest that you mention my profession. In fact you edited your post to make sure you mentioned that I am a 'health professional'. You are quite correct I am (although only part time these days as I am also part of an exciting new spin out company developing a diagnostic and therapeutic in stroke, but you won't be interested in that....). Anyway...what does my job have to do with any of this? What does my career in Medical Physics have to do with me tweeting about being hit by an egg whilst cycling? My impression from this, and this may not be your intent at all, is that you are suggesting I am not fit to do my job, and that perhaps someone should put a complaint in. That's how that comes across. If that is indeed your intent, please feel free to. You wouldn't be the first. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Am I always right? Well, of course not. However, I reacted to your posting on here, the way I did, for the reasons above. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I am glad you have not had any issues with cyclists on the road. Neither have I. I have though, as a cyclist had many issues with drivers. I am not alone. If you don't believe me have a look at the Near Miss Project (<a href="http://www.nearmiss.bike/">http://www.nearmiss.bike/</a>). It's an enlightening read. Also as the father of a daughter who rides horses (and who's wife used to) I too understand the needs of riders. I also know that sometimes riders are treated very badly on the road (<a href="http://www.herefordtimes.com/news/14293167.Horse_rider_shares_the_moment_lorry_got_too_close_for_comfort/">http://www.herefordtimes.com/news/14293167.Horse_rider_shares_the_moment_lorry_got_too_close_for_comfort/</a>)<br />
Then you mention the most bizarre thing...false accusations. Who am I falsely accusing and of what? I have accused no-one of anything, I have even at the very earliest point, only suggested that the egg appeared to come from the vehicle. I have no idea who owns this vehicle, or even exactly which type of vehicle it is (although I think it might be a Mitsubishi L200). By posting this I am warning others to keep an eye out for such vehicles and to be careful around them, as it would appear they have a grudge against cyclists. Is that so bizarre?!<br />
As for praying you don't sneeze when you pass? If I am honest that is just condescending. Do you ride a bike on the roads? Have you experienced being knocked of your bike, or having a vehicle driven at you? Have you experienced the abuse and intimidation? I have, and I can assure you it is not nice. I also know families of cyclists who have been killed. I was honoured to have been given a fallen cyclist's bike by one family as a thank you for the campaigning that I do. So, pardon me, if I get a little angry when I see people getting 'flippant' about the incidents that many cyclists face on the road.<br />
Finally, do I understand how blogs and Facebook works? Well, it turns out I do. Public posts are, public, and thus free to be commented on and..... shared. Just to prove the case, have a wee look here (Link back to this blog). I think I managed to post the blog right..... </blockquote>
magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-48684324114649152862016-10-28T09:28:00.002+01:002016-10-28T12:15:14.815+01:00The Mind of an Anti Bearsway CouncillorAs you'll have seen in one of my previous blogs,<a href="http://i%20wrote%20a%20letter%20to%20my%20local%20snp%20councillor%20anne%20mcnair/"> I wrote a letter to my local SNP councillor Anne McNair</a>, who <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/10/bearsway-council-meeting.html">voted against the Bears Way extension</a>. Unfortunately, despite me chasing via e-mail and on Twitter (local SNP group Twitter). I never did receive a reply. So yesterday, seeing that Anne had a surgery 10 minutes walk from my house, I went along for a chat.<br />
<br />
My 11 year old son came along, mainly as he wanted to hear why the lane wasn't being extended. Here is a summary of what happened. I should add, that twice during the meeting I stressed that if Anne wanted to say anything off record, that I'd be happy to keep those comments confidential. She didn't take me up on that.<br />
<br />
First off, let me state quite clearly, Anne was very nice, was very willing to listen and whilst she did dodge a few questions a wee bit, she was generally quite candid. She gave me about 50 minutes of her time. I thank her for that.<br />
<br />
I was though, pretty dismayed by the end of the meeting.<br />
<br />
First off I explained who I was and the fact that I had tried to contact her on a few occasions without any reply. Anne explained that Cllr Ian MacKay had put together a that was supposed to have been sent to everybody. I certainly hadn't received that, and Anne was surprised. No matter if this was true or not, my letter did not ask generic questions. I wanted to know why Anne had voted against it, not everyone else.<br />
<br />
The first interesting fact that I heard, regarded some comments from Jim Gibbons. After the vote he had e-mailed people suggesting that there would be congestion at Boclair (despite modelling suggesting otherwise), if the lane went in. Interestingly the SNP group apparently 'gave him a row' over that e-mail.<br />
<br />
The next interesting thing was that she didn't realise that Keith Small was suggesting that segregated cycle lanes in general were not the way forward. Anne seemed to think he was only talking about the A81. From his comments, and a meeting a friend of mine has had with him recently confirms he is opposed to them completely. Anne looked a little uncomfortable at this.<br />
<br />
It was then decided to ask a difficult question. <b>Were you pressured to vote as a political group on this?</b><br />
<br />
The answer was very interesting. Anne pointed out that voting in a group was normal practice. Normally the SNP was outnumbered by a coalition of the other groups, which the SNP couldn't stop. Only on planning, were councillors expected to vote individually, apparently. This I found very surprising. Councillors are individuals I thought...<br />
<br />
I then pointed out that Cllr Cummings (Ind) just before the vote, stood up and confirmed that this would be a free vote. Everyone murmered in agreement and someone, not sure who, said that this was always the case.<br />
<br />
Obviously it wasn't. Anne, did not remember Cllr Cummings comment.<br />
<br />
Anne then pulled out her mobile phone, whilst I was talking. She was showing me a picture of one of the chicanes in the lane at one of the bus stops. At this moment, I knew where she was going.<br />
<br />
Design. She didn't like the design. So I went into detail about the fact that I was probably the first and most vociferous opponent of the lane's design in the early days. I pointed out that I had <b>blogged about it</b>, and had<b> meetings about it</b>. However, I also pointed out that having lived with the lane, cycle in the lane, and driven alongside the lane, I had grown to appreciate it. I talked about the children I now see cycling along that road, that I had never seen before. I talked about the families that use it. I talked about the fact that it isn't yet connected and that some big issues would be resolved by extending it....<br />
<br />
We got into a discussion about why it had been designed the way it did. I pointed out that the bus stops could have been designed better, but remedial work had been planned (now stopped). I discussed some of the internal battles that went on within the council between departments (I've very good sources for this) and that the design is always going to be limited in scope in the current climate due to limited funding....<br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>But a lot of cyclists don't use it! </i><br />
<i><br /></i>
I must admit this surprised me. I'd heard this line being used before, but I didn't expect it from Anne. I pointed out that surveys have shown that 92% of cyclists do use it. Actually, a very large number considering the fact that Anne thinks the design is terrible.<br />
<br />
She repeated the <i>cyclists don't use it </i>line, and I repeated the 92%.<br />
<br />
We talked about off road, and I pointed out that cyclists are people and want to go where people want to go. That is down the main routes. They are main routes for a reason! I also asked how people would get to the off road routes.. Anne didn't answer.<br />
<br />
At this point someone popped their head in to the room and Anne had to pop out for 5 minutes, At that point I looked at my phone. That is when I saw the following Facebook reply to a news item about our <a href="https://friendsofbearsway.wordpress.com/2016/10/23/complete-the-bears-way-advocacy-ride/">advocacy ride</a>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfZBSO1o59dLnw9nuJ2zskq70T1mUclpFLyWpwpgN16dbl0QZfuraW2aRaQffddH4HqXX8ggCIrWN0J157Qrk2FOC3qleAWbChLYJTURSv10SMoqzfm-UciIYufQa0Aaq41sxOnDN7JNEw/s1600/Screenshot_20161026-194721.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfZBSO1o59dLnw9nuJ2zskq70T1mUclpFLyWpwpgN16dbl0QZfuraW2aRaQffddH4HqXX8ggCIrWN0J157Qrk2FOC3qleAWbChLYJTURSv10SMoqzfm-UciIYufQa0Aaq41sxOnDN7JNEw/s400/Screenshot_20161026-194721.png" width="225" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
When Anne came back in I showed her this, and I mentioned that these are the sort of images that the SNP are unintentionally aligning to.<br />
<br />
She looked uncomfortable.<br />
<br />
We discussed share use, and I pointed out that shared use wouldn't work, as I and many other cyclists just wouldn't use it. Anne suggested that roads like the A81 weren't the best place to start, and I suggested that main arterial routes were exactly the best place to start....etc. But it was at the end when I asked again...<br />
<br />
Why did you personally vote against the scheme?... This was Anne's answer..<br />
<br />
<i>They messed up phase 1, which was the easy bit, and you've got cyclists using the main carriageway. That tells me there is a design fault. Phase 2 has harder junctions and I'm not convinced by what I've seen in phase 1 that phase 2 will be designed right.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
I then asked the following...<br />
<br />
<i>Why then did you vote against it now, when we have only seen preliminary designs? If you are concerned about the design of phase 2, why not let it go to the detailed design stage where you can actually see the design, and vote on that!?</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
I actually asked Anne this question in two slightly different ways, and both times, she screwed her face up a bit, and shrugged. She didn't have an answer.<br />
<br />
After the second occasion I added...<br />
<br />
<i>Can you see why we are frustrated....?</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Yes, David.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
I then finished off by saying that I feel the decision was ridiculous, especially considering the benefits that cycling would have on pollution, congestion, health, etc. I also pointed out that the decision had ramifications far beyond East Dunbartonshire and that many from outside the area were watching closely.<br />
<br />
We stood up, shook hands and I took a slightly bored and tired 11 year old home, unfortunately not really having moved forward very much. I had to do it, I had to understand why a councillor who was actually pro-cycling in the past, had voted against Bears Way.<br />
<br />
We are now left with a path that starts and goes no-where, a section of a community that is angry enough to suggest placing tacks on a path where families are going to cycle, and a number of councillors who I believe, and this is my personal opinion, voted for the benefit of themselves rather than the area and people they represent.<br />
<br />
I'm not sure my son will value the word of politicians from now on. I think he is right.magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-17848402985666570812016-10-10T20:33:00.001+01:002016-10-10T20:40:09.416+01:00Predictions and ActionTonight I was going through old draft posts. Anyone who writes an active blog will likely be in the same position as me. You have blogs you publish, you have blogs that you start and then delete, and you have blogs that you start, get a fair way though and....well, you move on and it sits there as a draft, usually never seeing the light of day. However, tonight I came across this blog.....<br />
<br />
It was me being a bit daft. I was imagining a crazy situation where councils were ripping out cycle lanes and people were calling for roads to be widened. I actually wrote this about a year ago. A sort of Armageddon thought experiment.<br />
<br />
Oh dear.<br />
<br />
Yes, it would appear that my thought experiment is coming to pass. Cycle lanes are being<a href="http://road.cc/content/news/207146-ayrshire-bike-lane-be-ripped-outfor-%C2%A395000"> ripped out</a> and as you will know if you follow this blog, <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/10/bearsway-council-meeting.html">Bears Way is not being extended</a> and who knows, might be ripped out too, as <a href="http://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/14791773.Why_the_Bears_Way_cycle_decision_was_taken/?ref=twtrec">the local SNP don't think segregation is the way forward. </a><br />
<br />
Let's just give up then? Not a chance! Oh no. If we give up now, that's the end. But if we fight, and we fight hard, and we continue to challenge the misinformation and , let's face it, downright lies, then we will win in the end. Not sure?! Well, all you need to do is sign a wee petition. It only takes a minute (unless you want to add a comment, which is always welcome!). Despite what some of the locals tell you, you don't have to be local to have a say. What happens with Bears Way will have an effect on future schemes all around the country.<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">******-------</span>So please, PLEASE... <a href="https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/complete-the-bearsway-project"><b><span style="font-size: large;">sign this petition here</span></b></a> <span style="font-size: large;">-------******</span><br />
<br />
Anyway, here is the blog that was a draft. It looks like it is coming to pass, but only if you let it....<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>You know what? Let's forget it.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>It's too much hassle, people just don't get it. The car is, and always remain king.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Let's just leave it there.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>No. In fact that isn't enough. Let's get the cycle lanes that have been built and rip them out. Let's return the roads to their former glory. Nice and wide, nice and fast and free of cyclists and pedestrians.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>We all need to get to where we are going fast. We need to get to work, we need to get to the gym (to ride a stationary bike), we need to visit friends, we need to pop a couple of hundred metres down the road to the local shop to get some milk. We need to take the kids to their sports clubs...we need to take the kids to school.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>That all has to happen fast. Time is precious, time is short. It does not matter that when we get to where we are going that parking spaces are short, we will just ask the council for more. Congestion is a problem, though it isn't because there are too many cars on the road. Oh no, there just aren't enough roads and the roads that we have don't have enough lanes.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Build more roads, and widen the ones we have!</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Sure, we'd loose a bit more green space, but that doesn't really matter, as we can all drive out to the countryside. Sure the countryside has a shortage of parking spaces, but once again our councils can sort that. Oh, and the roads might need widened to get there fast...</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>All this talk of obesity? Not a problem. With more people driving and more parking spaces outside gyms, we can get to the gym quicker and more often. None of those pesky cyclists holding us up! Parking will be free of course. Driving costs far too much already don't you know!</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>In fact, we need to make sure the price of motoring goes down. We need more oil. Yes! Fracking is the answer. Oh, yes the majority of UK fracking will only produce gas and not usable oil, but fear not, other countries can increase their fracking too! There is plenty of oil in he ground, we just need to innovate and we can draw out more and more.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Run out?! Ha! Not in our lifetime. That's someone else's problem....and as for climate change, well, we could do with it being a bit warmer in Scotland.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Pollution? Na. Cars are getting cleaner and cleaner all the time. Car manufacturers are honest decent folk who want a cleaner environment too! Anyway, electric cars are coming and there is absolutely no pollution from electric cars whatsoever. Yes, at least half a cars lifetime emissions come from the cars manufacture, and yes, electric cars need to get their electricity from somewhere, and that somewhere is often polluting, but hey, it's another chance for innovation!</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-64203012913448102042016-10-05T22:00:00.002+01:002016-10-05T22:20:10.872+01:00Bearsway Council MeetingAs you will all be aware now, the Bears Way cycle lane which is a four phase project, is now a one phase project. That is, it will, for the forseable future not be extended. It will remain as it is, a cycle lane that starts pretty much no-where, and ends pretty much no-where.<br />
<br />
I could accept the fact that it was incomplete, because I knew it was the start of something longer and better, but the council (at least one particular section of the council, decided against it). Why? Well, before we get to that I'll describe my experience attending the council meeting.<br />
<br />
Apologies, this might be quite long, and as I write it I am likely to become a bit more agitated. There will be grammar and spelling mistakes. But this needs to come out of my head, and off the notes on the paper fresh and unadulterated. This will truly be the Mind of a Helmet Camera Cyclist. However, I think it will be worth the read. I don't plan to hold back. My mind has a habit of speaking its mind...<br />
<br />
The meeting was set to start at 6pm. Unfortunately due to childcare commitments, and a wife that likes to see me occasionally I could not go along to the meeting. However, after chatting with a fellow concerned Twitter cyclist, he went along at 6pm and would have to leave early and I'd pop along later. Apparently these meetings could go on beyond 11pm...<br />
<br />
So I drive to the council building (sorry!) and park outside. As I get out the car I notice some council employees leaving the building. It looked like they were locking up...<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"The meeting started at 6pm...."</blockquote>
Anyway after a few minutes they decided to let me in, and told me where the meeting was. So off I went though the deserted council offices....<br />
<br />
I found the door to the meeting and went in. The meeting was in full flow, although my entrance seemed to raise a few eyebrows. Perhaps that had something to do with the Pedal on Parliament t-shirt I was wearing. Who knows. I found my seat and the meeting continued.<br />
<br />
I was sat next to about 4 or 5 other members of the public, one of which who appeared to have a booklet with all the meeting reports in it and one that was using a tablet. I got out my phone and started tweeting.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Sorry, but you have to switch that off...."</blockquote>
Turns out, electronic equipment has to be switched off in the chamber. Thus, no way of sharing with the wider public, what is happening in a public meeting. Very democratic. Anyway, I complied and turned my phone off. At which point I gently pointed out the chap on his tablet.....<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Ah, but he's only using it to read the agenda..."</blockquote>
<br />
Hmm. anyway the tablet user decided to put it away at this point anyway.<br />
<br />
A short while later after a few agenda points were dealt with the next point on the agenda came up, relating to a crossing point to the new Hub building in Bearsden. This agenda was led by Cllr Cummings (independent). He wanted a new crossing point, pretty much everyone else (a few exceptions) didn't see the need for it.<br />
<br />
Cut a long story short, he wanted a crossing that you would have to cross two side roads to use to get anywhere useful, everyone else pointed this out, Cllr Cummings got asked a few questions about it, took offence and got grumpy that everyone was making it personal. They weren't. Cllr Cummings then asked that an amendment be tabled. It was pointed out that it would have made life easier if he had prepared this before the meeting (he hadn't) and it took a while for him to convey the exact wording of the amendment. At this point, someone pointed out that the amendment that he was tabling, had already been covered in the report before the council and thus, this was a whole waste of time, Cllr Cummings got even more cross at alleged personal attacks, and everyone got a bit grumpy.<br />
<br />
In the end he agreed that he would table something at a later meeting.<br />
<br />
That all took about 45 minutes.<br />
<br />
There followed a 10 minute adjournment (I found out that 10 minutes in council chambers actually means 20 minutes). I got chatting to my Twitter friend, who would have to leave soon, and we both agreed that it had been a bit of a farce up until now. Things would improve, surely...<br />
<br />
During the break I said hello to a few council members who I happened to know. One councillor who I didn't know came over to talk to me.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Why don't you cycle on the canal?"</blockquote>
Off to a great start there! I explained my reasons. Turned out that this councillor (who was Cllr Gibbons of SNP) also cycled, had once lived in the area, but was now in Bearsden. He was definitely chatting as if he liked Bears Way and showed me the plans that had been submitted for the Sustrans competition previously (segregated lanes around the Burnbrae Roundabout). I susggested that they were very good, and he appeared to agree....well in hindsight I'm not 100% sure he did...but at the time he was coming across positively.<br />
<br />
So I ask him, how does he think it will go...<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Depends. See that chap over there (Cllr MacKay), he's not feeling great. It all depends on if he manages to last to the vote or not. If he manages it will go against Bears Way".</blockquote>
This was interesting. It indicated that the vote was pretty much already known. They knew who would probably vote which way. I (wrongly) assumed that Gibbons would be voting for, and his fellow SNP Cllr was voting against. Was this a party split? If so, fair enough as it should be a free vote (and this was mentioned before the vote by Cllr Cummings where he specifically suggested that it would be. There were a few surprises that he mentioned it...)<br />
<br />
Anyway the meeting soon started again.<br />
<br />
This section consisted of technical questions related to the report which had been prepared by the council. This report was comprehensive. In fact there were a few comments on quite how comprehensive it was at 232 pages. I did not have a copy of the report at the meeting. although I do now. <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/4ilakw7gf4s8nmo/160929%20EDC%20Public%20Booklet%20-%20Bears%20Way.pdf?dl=0">You can read it for yourself, here. </a><br />
<br />
The important section stated:<br />
<br />
3.1. It is recommended that the Council:-<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
a) Notes the report and the review of Phase 1 and approves proposed amendments to<br />
Phase 1<br />
b) Notes the options available for the continuation of the Bears Way following the<br />
modelling exercise and the feedback from the recent consultation exercise<br />
c) Based on a) and b) above instructs officers to proceed to the detailed design stage of<br />
Phase 2 in accordance with option 4 within this report and to continue with the<br />
principle of the segregated cycle lane, ensuring that as part of this further detailed<br />
stakeholder consultation will be carried out throughout the design, development and<br />
implementation of Phase 2 of the project.</blockquote>
<br />
Before it could get further two amendments were placed on record. One by Cllr Small (SNP)<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMDv0EPg9nrsCjsjObXW7FEItU9YmfLp4gkgPUqbDBYxUEnQjZu8w78MSvKq7wlX13_ouVp7QbiVTQCAbhlX_vdsXzAexy2NvYGs1AZIYHQ0DObYl4_36or5kMJd2a8ZVHsq-zWXKutkvT/s1600/IMG_20161004_130507.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMDv0EPg9nrsCjsjObXW7FEItU9YmfLp4gkgPUqbDBYxUEnQjZu8w78MSvKq7wlX13_ouVp7QbiVTQCAbhlX_vdsXzAexy2NvYGs1AZIYHQ0DObYl4_36or5kMJd2a8ZVHsq-zWXKutkvT/s320/IMG_20161004_130507.jpg" width="239" /></a></div>
<br />
And one was from Cllr Cummings<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEihYhvYQv4JEQcpYwaoy3JfSMrror16nDG-a2qpl_ek6g6ZB3ruESvzF8g9zLuEeR9S_EzN_0rsTOMrr946LzK2tA7FrzNsKIUchrFv3IO5bMlgQcWwZ1oc3VFXxLDS81asBWBsyu5bEcGm/s1600/IMG_20161004_130440.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEihYhvYQv4JEQcpYwaoy3JfSMrror16nDG-a2qpl_ek6g6ZB3ruESvzF8g9zLuEeR9S_EzN_0rsTOMrr946LzK2tA7FrzNsKIUchrFv3IO5bMlgQcWwZ1oc3VFXxLDS81asBWBsyu5bEcGm/s320/IMG_20161004_130440.jpg" width="239" /></a></div>
<br />
When they 'shockingly' realise that there were two, the paused the meeting, got together for a couple of minutes and then agreed a new mish mash, wording. It was as follows.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
The Council agreed as follows:-</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
a) To note the report and the review of Phase 1 approve proposed improvements bullet points 1 and 2 as detailed in 5.13, page 206, and instructs Officers to report back to Council on the full implications and costs of bullet points 3 and 4. The Report would include a full and meaningful public consultation with all Community Councils in Bearsden and Milngavie, all Residents? Associations, bus operators, Strathclyde Partnership for Transport and disability groups:</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
b) To note the options available for the continuation of the Bears Way following the modelling exercise and the feedback from the recent consultation exercise;</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
c) Not to proceed with any of the Phase 2 options;</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
d) To take note of all elements of public consultation, and all comments received from members of the community;</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
e) To note the recently organised and submitted petition by Mrs Aileen McIntyre on change.org that contained 2600 signatures, and numerous comments regarding Bears Way; and</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
f) That any future works associated with Phase 1, or any subsequent works, must include the protection of residential, commercial and commuter parking.</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Lots of things were striking about that, but two specifically - cycling groups will not be invited to consult (see (a)). This was pointed out by the labour councillors, but Keith Small (who led the adjusted amendment declined to add them). Secondly the fact that future works on phase 1 must protect parking.<br />
<br />
Cyclists were not mentioned at all.<br />
<br />
So Keith Small stood up to support the amendment first.<br />
<br />
First thing he said, was...<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I am not anti cycling.....but....</blockquote>
Bingo!<br />
<br />
He went on to say that all needed to be considered and stressed that cycling was not the ONLY way of promoting health in the community. He said that segregation had produced conflict. He stressed that the road width had been reduced and that phase 2 would reduce road width.<br />
<br />
He then quoted a very strange quote that he said he heard from a business person:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Pure cars, pure parking, pure business.</blockquote>
I'm not sure what that was about!<br />
<br />
He stressed that car ownership in the area was high and that many families had 2, 3 or more cars. "People work hard to buy a car". The suggestion being that having worked hard for that car, you had more right....<br />
<br />
He then suggested that rail passenger numbers had recently increased significantly, and made the comment "practical people get the train". He then stressed that the current percentage of people ccling was small (yes 2% up from 0.8% before Bears Way, an incomplete lane...). He was concerned that parking displaced by the lane (which was apparently going to be very small) would result in people driving further, leading to more car use. Yes, that confused me to.<br />
<br />
He then finished off by saying that 18,000 vehicle journeys a day occur along the road, and that they were frustrated by the 8% that are not using the lane.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"People need their car!"</blockquote>
<br />
The Cllr Moody (Lib Dem) stood up.<br />
<br />
He admitted that they had agreed on phase 1 consultation, and was glad he did. He then waffled off a bit (I think I drifted off...) . He mentioned site visits to Asda and Boclair, and that some road engineers he spoke to said that the junctions were at capacity and any changes would make things worse (Hmmm). He stated quite clearly:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"No one had ever e-mailed him asking for segregated cycle lanes".</blockquote>
There is some dispute about at what stage in the process the first person did, as we know people did!<br />
<br />
He then told us how he used to cycle, but recently has only cycled 10 times. He prefers cycling on wide roads. he also pointed out that we couldn't control cyclists. We couldn't force them to use the cycle path. He then pointed out that just because there is 'free money available' doesn't mean we need to accept it. Yes, he is saying he doesn't want the money.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"We've dug a hole, we should stop digging"</blockquote>
Cllr Moir (Lab) stood up.<br />
<br />
He supports the report, and points out that those now against the scheme were previously in favour. But there had been a big change in April. He wasn't sure why.... The lane was working, and had an added bonus of slowing traffic. Accident rates pre and post lane were exactly the same. Significant health benefits. He then quotes Derek Mackay and Humza Yousaf who were supportive of the scheme.<br />
<br />
Anothe labour councillor stood up (didn't catch his name)<br />
He was amazed at the political turnaround. He hoped those that vote against will be ready for the response after.<br />
<br />
Cllr Henry (Lab) stood up. By far the best of the night. Well done to the council officers, especially in the face of abuse. The whole tone of the campaign had been horrible. She had spent time in London and though the segregated lanes there were wonderfu;. She was pleased when she heard they would come to East Dunbartonshire. They were giving people a choice, they were for the next generation, visionary, exciting. We needed to be brave and have vision.<br />
<br />
Cllr Shergill (Lab) stood up. He pointed out that Derek Mackay said the scheme was exemplar, and it had been endorsed by Humza.<br />
<br />
Cllr Cummings (Ind) stood up. He went on for a fair but telling us how long he had been a councillor, "17 years representing communities"...I drifted again.... Then he came back on focus, saying that this was the most controversial scheme he'd every been involved in. People were deeply upset (I still cannot fathom why!!) He then mentioned a blog that someone had written somewhere (I don't think it was me, but ....<b>hello Cllr Cummings if you are reading</b>....). the blog had called him 'anti cyclist'. He claimed he wasn't, as he cycled a bike sometimes in remote places (yes he did actually say that), so not anti and he'd never met anyone who is anti cycling....but.....he didn't actually say this, but it's pretty obvious he hates cycle infrastructure. He's not anti cycling, so long as you cycle far away from anywhere remotely populated....<br />
<br />
At this point, everyone in the room was flagging, and no-one else could be bothered to talk, so Cllr Small got back up to sum up.<br />
<br />
He didn't hold back and went straight for the juggular using all the misinformation at his disposal....<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>"Segregated lanes are not a good way to encourage cycling"</b></blockquote>
Apparently.<br />
<br />
Who knew!?<br />
<br />
Milngavie Road was apparently, in his words, 'shared space'.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>"Motorists and cyclists co-existed happily."</b></blockquote>
<br />
Oh yes indeedy. We have entered cloud cuckoo land. I often had drivers giving me a friendly wave. In fact they would often stop and give me a cuddle. No diver ever shouted abuse at me, swerved at me, claimed I had no right to be on the road....oh no. It was all just a bad dream....<br />
<br />
Sorry, I digress...<br />
<br />
Segregation my dear friends (and this is pretty much what he said), was heading down the wrong road (ahem). The way to achieve 10% modal share of cycling was to get people cycling between where they live and schools. Where they live and shops.<br />
<br />
He stressed it agian, just in case we hadn't beleived him the first two times...<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>"Segregation will not get to 10%"</b></blockquote>
Right! Haud the bus! Just stop what you are doing! Yes you, Amsterdam (and many cities and towns near by), Copenhagan, London, Seville, New York, Oslo, Minneapolis (yes really) Bogata, Stockholm, Malmo, Berlin.......etc etc. Yes you lot. You've got it all wrong. Listen to the SNP, Lib Dems and a couple of independent councillors in east Dunbartonshire. They know best! Rip it out. Build more roads. Cyclists and drivers get on just fine. Honest.<br />
<br />
Oh and he said the lane was over engineered. It needed to be less intrusive. So I suspect that means, it needs to be out in the sticks (as Cllr Cummings seems to prefer), shared with pedestrians (oh yes that works) or a wee bit of paint on the road. Can't be holding up the car drivers who have been sold a dream of easy driving by the marketing departments of the car companies!<br />
<br />
Oh no!!<br />
<br />
Cllr Geekie (lab) stood up and surveyed the damage done by arguments you just can't argue against because you couldn't really do it in a council chamber without being really insulting....<br />
She pointed out that you will never please drivers with cycle infrastructure (I don't actually agree with that, as a recent survey suggested that the happiest drivers were in the Netherlands...). She pointed out that improvements had already been made to phase 1, and that not having phase 2 would please no-one. The lane must be extended.<br />
<br />
Tada! That my friends was the end of that. A short recess was called (to some mutterings and folk wanted to get home), and councillors checked that there would be no voting against local party policy. They came back....It was all a blur by this point....and the vote proceeded. It went quickly, and I couldn't keep up, but there were many voting for the amendment, including Cllr (I'm a friend of cyclists) Gibbons, and Cllr Anne (I was on the board of the local cycling coop) McNair (who incidentally hasn't replied to my e-mail...).<br />
<br />
Long story short (well, it's already long).... 11 for Bearsway, 12 for amendment that effectively killed it.<br />
<br />
I wasn't for staying a minute longer. I stood up, and everyone looked around (as there were only two of us in the very close public gallery) and I couldn't help myself. Looking at the SNP group I said...<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>"Shame........Shame......"</b></blockquote>
I noted the slight smirk on Cllr Small's face, and I walked out.<br />
<br />
And there you have it. East Dunbartonshire said yes to the driver, and no to anyone wanting to use a bike. There is not allowed to be a vote on this now for another 6 months, by which time we will be in the midst of a council election, which is likely to bring us more SNP councillors.<br />
<br />
Don't forget folks the SNP and the Liberal Democrats are progressive parties. Yes they are. Well, they aren't where I live.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
</blockquote>
magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-84476037353604939842016-09-30T20:48:00.000+01:002016-09-30T20:48:59.515+01:00My Letter to AnneI have sent the following letter to my local SNP councillors who voted against phase 2 of the Bears Way cycle lane.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Dear Anne McNair,<br />
<br />
As a local constituent, as an organiser of Pedal on Parliament, and as a member of Friends of Bearsway, can I please ask, what were your personal reasons for voting for the amendment to the Bears Way report at last nights meeting?<br />
<br />
Previously you have suggested to me that you support cycling and investment of cycle infrastructure. Thus, I am confused, given the overwhelming evidence for the benefits of cycling, the overwhelming evidence that segregated infrastructure needs to play a large part in a functioning cycle network, and the overwhelming evidence that if you build such infrastructure that it encourages significant uptake of active travel, that you voted against this scheme.<br />
<br />
The scheme certainly isn't perfect, however, it is, or should I say was, a big step in the right direction. I had never seen children cycling along that route until the introduction of the new cycle lane. I personally have never felt safer, than when I cycle in that cycle lane. I had hoped that when complete, and my children were at Boclair Acadamy, that they could, on occasion, cycle along with me from Torrance on their way to school. This will no longer be possible.<br />
<br />
I am also extremely confused, because this local decision goes against your own parties national policy, with both Derek Mackay and Hamza Yousuf both recently commending the lane at an event where the lane won a national award. The assertions by your colleague Keith Small, that segregation infrastructure is not the way to reach your own parties 'aspiration' for a 10% modal share, flies in the face of international wisdom. I would be keen to see what references you or Keith have for this assertion.<br />
<br />
How exactly will people cycle to Waitrose or Asda safely, as suggested by Keith, without segregation? Certainly not with paint on the roads. I can assure you, the previous layout of the road did NOT result in a happy co-existance of road users, as was asserted by Keith.<br />
<br />
Also can you confirm for me if your decision to vote for the amendment was indeed a personal decision? I was surprised that your whole party voted in one block, against the extension of the lane. I am no expert in politics, but this looked very much like it was a local party decision to vote against the lane as one group. Was this in fact a personal decision, or a party decision?<br />
<br />
I, and many others like me are aghast at this decision (as I stated as I left the meeting room last night). On the face of it you have voted in favour of party politics, and not in the best interests of your constituents, and the future of East Dunbartonshire. This decision will have implications far beyond the authorities boundary, and will as a result have ongoing implications in the areas of health, pollution, climate change, transport inequality, and congestion. Are you happy that you have made the right decision in that regard?<br />
<br />
I look forward to your reply, and I ask that you also provide a seperate reply that I can give to my three children aged 11, 9 and 6, who were all very exited about being able to 'cycle through Bearsden and Milngavie' on a safe cycle path.<br />
<br />
Yours sincerely,<br />
<br />
Dr David Brennanmagnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-27630360520856683162016-09-28T16:39:00.000+01:002016-09-28T16:43:04.250+01:00Failed by the PoliceAs I'm sure most of my readers will know I occasionally report bad driving to the police. Not often, because the process is not nice, but I do do it where I feel the driving has been particularly bad. This was one such case.<br />
<br />
Today I went to court and was told that the case was to be dropped. Why? Well, the police hadn't served the driver with <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/172">a section 172</a>, which requires the owner of the vehicle to tell the police who was driving at the time of an incident. Thus, there was no evidence that could be presented to court identifying who the driver was. I was informed all of this by the Procurator Fiscal. This is all despite the fact that, whoever the driver was, the driver had requested that the police counter charge me with careless driving as I had apparently 'forced the driver to brake sharply when I filtered in front'.<br />
<br />
So.....and this is a little long winded...... an unidentified driver made a complaint about my cycling, that just so happened to be the driver I was complaining about, which means that driver would have had to give the police his details, and, unless he was lying, would have provided information on the incident in question, but....the court can't be sure who he (I can only assume he was a he....) was?<br />
<br />
Here is video of the incident in question. As you'll see, the van is a <a href="http://www.carkeycentre.co.uk/">Car Key Centre</a> van. Feel free to make up your own mind.<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/89AP83T5WE4" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
What follows are not necessarily the facts of the case. What follows are my opinions of what may or may not happened. I'm going to be fair and provide a number of alternative explanations. Feel free to chose which one you think is accurate based on your own opinon. Perhaps you even have another alternative....<br />
<br />
Option 1<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I filter in front of the driver just as the queue starts to move. I filter in safely, as I do nearly every day on numerous occasions without incident. The driver did not like this for some reason and decided to drive close to me. I indicate that I don't like this with a palm back gesture. He pulls out and as he passes swerves his van towards me (whilst hitting his horn) in anger. I am forced to swerve into another, fortunately empty lane. The suggestion being that he used his vehicle as weapon.</blockquote>
Option 2<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
He accidentally dropped his mobile phone and accidentally hit the accelerator, bringing him closer to me. He decided the safest course of action was to try and overtake. As he was passing he went to grab the phone and accidentally hit his horn and swerved towards me. He looked back relieved to see that I had safely swerved into the filter lane. He picked up his phone and apologised to the caller for interrupting the call....</blockquote>
Option 3<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
He spotted a friend in the distance, and wanted to get closer, so he accelerated. He noticed a cyclist ahead of him, so pulled out. He hit his horn to say hello and swerved closer to give them a wave, forgetting in that instance that the pesky cyclist was in the way. He met up with the friend later for drinks and had a laugh about the whole unfortunate incident.</blockquote>
Option 4<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
He carries a large electromagnet in the back of his van, which he accidentally activated as he approached me. This interacted with the aluminium of my bike (actually this does happen, look up Eddie Currents) and caused deviation in his course. He hit the horn to warn me of his big magnet.</blockquote>
<br />
Who knows?!<br />
<br />
In my opinion justice was not served today. It wasn't allowed to. There are some great police, and I've been helped by them over the years, but this time police screwed up. Serving a section 172 is standard in these cases. So why wasn't it in this case?<br />
<br />
Unfortunately this is not the first time that the police have messed up in incidents I have reported. <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2015/06/the-failure-of-justice.html">These two failed due</a> to the police <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/53/section/1">not issuing a section 1</a>, which warns the driver that their charges can be changed.<br />
<br />
How can such simple, school boy errors be made? Would those type of errors be acceptable in any other type of job? How on earth, considering the evidence that the police had seen, was I charged with careless cycling? Why, if this section 172 had never been issued was the case allowed to progress to court?<br />
<br />
So, all three drivers are still free to drive, free of prosecution, not guilty of any charges and probably happy as Larry. In my opinion, that is unacceptable. You may have an opinion too......<br />
<br />
What is clear, is that we can't depend on the police to protect us. They might, and as I've said, ther are some great police officers out there, but they might not. It is unfortunately luck of the draw. We need to take the conflict away from our roads. We need to redesign them so drivers like this, can't endanger me, or anyone else any more. This is exactly why, we need investment in proper cycle infrastructure. This is why people asking for the Bears Way to get ripped up, must not succeed.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com10tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-28267816931619478632016-09-27T20:07:00.000+01:002016-09-27T20:07:31.704+01:00Chaos in Milngavie?!It's a wet day in September (27th Sept 2016). It's morning rush hour. It's chaos in Milngavie....<br />
<br />
Well, not quite....<br />
<br />
About 5 or 6 cars (and their occupants!) are held up for about 21 seconds behind a coach picking up school kids.<br />
<br />
That was it.<br />
<br />
Chaos. Apparently. At least that is what I keep getting told at consultation meetings for the Bears Way.<br />
<br />
In fact here is a video which I emplore you to watch that documents the chaos.<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tGIvOeBlXB4" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
Not exactly chaos next to the cycle lane, was it? In fact, despite all the talk of chaos along the route, I haven't seen one video from a local resident demonstrating any chaos. Strange that, considering I keep hearing about it so much. I'm sure those opposed to the cycle lane would be quick to post footage if it existed.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Mind you, if you are looking for chaos, just fast forward 1.5 miles down the road to the Switchback (second half of the video) Now that is chaos. Well, OK, not exactly chaos, more of a very long orderly queue of motor traffic. A queue that, if we encourage more people to drive in Milngavie and Bearsden, will only get longer.<br />
<br />
Is the answer to rip out the Bears Way? Encourage more people to drive? No. The answer is to encourage the people, those who can, to travel in a different way. Active travel is one of those new choices that a fully completed Bears Way would provide. A choice that only a few take currently, but as has been demonstrated in many other places already, would, if it was made safer. The Bears Way can make it safer.<br />
<br />
So, politicians of East Dunbartonshire, are you really going to vote car? Or are you going to vote for a better future?magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-80068438241789412202016-09-19T20:22:00.001+01:002016-09-19T20:22:45.473+01:00Bloodycyclists!<div class="tr_bq">
We've all seen the newspaper headlines of drivers getting a slap on the wrist for Death By Careless Driving charges. Unfortunately I could link to loads of examples where justice is, quite clearly, hasn't been served.</div>
<br />
Anyone who follows this blog will know that gaining justice can also be difficult for other less newsworthy incidents. Whilst I have <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f5j-YS5aA">had some success</a>, it is still a very difficult process to go through. There is a hint that things may be changing with some excellent news coming from the <a href="https://www.west-midlands.police.uk/latest-news/news.aspx?id=4942">West Midland Police</a>, but will change ever come to Glasgow?<br />
<br />
Fellow cyclist and Twitter friend <a href="https://twitter.com/sturmeyarcher3">@sturmeyarcher3</a> has had some experiences with the police in Glasgow that he wanted to share. This demonstrates that whilst there appears to be a willingness to help, the process is difficult and often fruitless. This is exactly why police forces need to be as pro-active as possible. and to follow West Midlands Police's lead...<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
<i>The first round of fixtures was on the 30th May 2009. A beautiful sunny afternoon; the lark on the wing, the snail on the thorn kind of thing. I’m riding my bike to a local shop, a route I used for my commute every working day. I know from previous readings from my bike computer (sadly no more, but more of that later) that my speed would have been about 30mph (it’s a fast downhill, so it”s the fastest I’ll ever go), in a 30 zone, so I’m not holding anyone up.<br />I’m down, I don’t know what’s happened, what’s happening. A woman is talking to me, asking me if I’m ok. Of course I’m ok, I’m on my bike. I’m not though. I recognise the road, but from a crazy angle. There’s blood. Lots. The woman is talking to someone else- ‘this is what you’ve done’- or something like that. A man says ‘sorry’. The woman talks to me again, tells me not to move, the ambulance is coming.<br />In the ambulance, paramedics check me over. The noise of what Glasgow children call ‘nee-naws’ in my ears. They ask me what happened. ‘I was riding my bike…’.<br />Hospital, a trolley being wheeled into A&E. Clothes being cut from me. I’m covered in road rash. The doctor tells me I’ve been in a collision- news to me- I was riding my bike, then I was down- I’d fallen off somehow, that’s what I thought. Collision? The doctor says I’ve given the witnesses a fright- all that blood. He laughs. “So many wee blood vessels there- it always looks really bad- even when it’s not”. He’s more concerned by my neck and spine, but it turns out the road rash and the bleeding from those wee blood vessels were the worst of it, physically anyway.<br />The police arrive, and I wonder what I did wrong. I can’t think straight. ‘Tell us what happened’.<br />I say that I was doing about thirty, secondary position, know the road very well- I guess I must have hit a pothole. The officer shakes his head. ‘No. Your bike was hit by an overtaking vehicle- your handlebars have taken the paint off his passenger door’. Blimey. The driver of the car behind me had seen it all, seen the dangerous overtake, seen me being taken out, and stopped to help. Someone in that woman’s car had gone to the traffic lights a short way down the road to confront the driver of the car that had hit me, and brought him back to see what he’d done-<br />‘this is what you’ve done’- or something like that. A man says ‘sorry’.<br />The police officer says that the driver was in his late 80s, says he didn’t know he’d hit me.<br />A few hours and some kindly joshing (what sort of bike have you got? Lots of cyclists on the team here!) later I’m discharged. I get into a taxi, newly aware that I’m a victim of dangerous driving, newly aware of my own mortality, mightily relieved generally. Seeing my bandaged head and hands and shredded clothes the cabbie asks what happened. I tell him what the police said. ‘That’s this year’s holiday paid for then big man’. Eh? What? He says that the driver was at fault and I should claim, easy-peasy.<br />I’d hadn’t thought of that.<br />A couple of days later when my head had cleared a bit I called the CTC solicitors and asked their advice. ‘Give us as much detail as possible, we’ll talk to the police and take it from there’. A month or two and a few attempts at ‘no helmet so contributory negligence’ nonsense later, they pay up. My injuries, my trashed bike and bike computer, all tidied up into a sum of money. In other words, guilt admitted.<br />Justice though, what about that? The two police officers had said that they were in no doubt that the ‘old boy’ shouldn’t be on the road, hadn’t stopped when he’d hit me, didn’t even know he’d hit me- and the book should be thrown at him. So due process took place, and many months later I’m going in the front door of the district court. Suddenly my name is called and I’m in a small room with a man who looks like he’s far too busy for the likes of me- doesn’t even look at me. He’s the Procurator Fiscal and asks about the ‘accident’- not my word. What did I see? I tell him that I didn’t ‘see’ anything, I was riding my bike and then I was down. I’m sure he harrumphed. ‘Well if that’s all you can say you’re an unreliable witness and we won’t proceed’. I was shown the door. Out in the street I felt like I’d just been trashed into the road again. I couldn’t describe what happened so the ‘crime’ didn’t happen. Just like that.</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i><b>Road crime 1 Justice 0.</b></i></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<i>About three years later, about half a mile from home, not as far as the spot where the previous incident took place, a converted minibus gave me a really close pass. I mean really close. I mean a magnatom-type-screaming-at-him close pass. Another magnatom thing-I’d taken to shouting out and trying to memorise number plates of those who come close to killing me, I did so. At the next set of lights (it’s inevitable that these dangerous folk don’t really get anywhere fast, for all their nutcase driving) I pull up on the inside (bags of room, he’s turning right) and tap on the nearside window. He winds it down, I tell him him he’d passed too close. I shouted it, he’d terrified me. I know. Abuse followed. Cyclist bingo. Then he slipped the brake off, allowed the vehicle to roll back a couple of yards, then turned the wheel and drove at me. Twice. I managed to unclip and jump onto the pavement. He then jumped the red light and was gone.<br />I’m shaken. Unhurt, but shaken. The driver of the car next in the queue at the lights spoke to me, said I should report it. I remembered the harrumphing PF and thought ‘no’. She gave me her name and number and asked me again to report it. As I cycled to work I turned it over in my mind, and pitched up at the House of Plod. Reported. A few weeks later I got a Sunday morning phone call asking me to visit the local police station. I was interviewed in a store cupboard. ‘What was I wearing?’ ‘Did you have your hi-viz on?’.’You should wear a camera- we do but it means we have to be on our best behaviour’.<br />Upshot? No such vehicle with the number plate I and the witness described. ‘Maybe false plates’. No further action.</i> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
<i><b>Road crime 2 Justice 0.</b></i> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
<i>August 1 2015. A lovely Saturday evening, 7pm ish. I head out to see the new Bearsway, a controversial (motorists hate it) cycle lane. 50 yards from home I’m punishment passed by a high revving 4×4. I’m human. I gave him the vickies. 75 yards up the road he stopped- middle of the road. He’s blocking the whole lane, and gets out of the car and stands in the other lane, simultaneously stopping me getting past him and stopping cars coming the other way. I don’t fancy a close confrontation with this madman so try to cycle up the inside, and he rushes across and decks me. I’m down.<br />My hip and knee have hit the kerb and my bike is on top of me. I somehow unclip, get out and take my camera from my jersey pocket. Shaking with fear I take a photo of the number plate (I learned something from the previous incident), but no way am I pointing it at the face of the clearly incensed driver. The driver of a car which had been stopped by the incident got out and instructed the madman to move. ‘You didn’t see what he did- he tried to swerve into me!’ (Bike versus 4x 4- yeah right). Mr Angry moved to hit me again. ‘Police officer instructing you to get in your vehicle!’ Where did that come from? It was the witness. Mr Angry fumed, but obeyed and was gone.<br />I thanked the witness, wondered how he’s thought of that one – ‘I am a police officer- off duty so I can’t call it in- but you should’. Off duty officers can’t call the police? Eh? Anyway, I thank the witness, I’m sure he saved me from further damage- the driver was seriously nuts, the bastard child of Ronnie Pickering and Jason Wells with a touch of Keith Peat’s Dog- but angrier and violent.<br />So I go to local plodshop. Statement taken (once she’s found a pen). It gets a bit silly here, but I made none of it up.<br />I ask what happens next. ‘We’ll make enquiries’. Then what? How can I find out- shall I come back in? Sharp intake of breath. ‘Ah, well, you see, this is A division, not B division.’ What?<br />‘It’s a B division incident, so when it’s processed we pass it on to B division and than we can’t access the details because we’re A division and we’re not allowed to see B division records”<br />I make a smart arse comment about Police Scotland being a unified force that probably has an intranet all of its own. No deal. ‘You can’t come back to this office- even if it is your nearest police office, this is A division, you’re B division’.<br />I ask for a crime/incident number so that I can follow up with what’s happening. Sharp intake of breath. ‘We can’t allocate an incident number- we don’t have a typist on duty’ A typist. In 2015 the law stops for want of a typist.<br />To be fair, an incident number was then phoned to me later that evening, but what if I hadn’t insisted?<br />Two weeks pass and an officer from B division phones. He wants a statement. I do it all again.<br />He tells me that the vehicle has a registered keeper in Wales. So? ‘Well, that makes it complicated’. How? Silence. Crime. UK police force, make a phone call. I say these things, maybe not in that order, maybe with a tinge of incredulity. Silence. ‘Leave it with me’.<br />Months later, Sunday evening, two police officers at my door. Statement taken. Again. The ‘Wales’ story again. ‘It’s complicated’. Again. I ask if the witness is really a police officer- ‘yes he is’.<br />To my mind it’s open and shut. Crime witnessed by police. Photo evidence of the vehicle used by the criminal taken at the scene. But it’s ‘complicated’.<br />Months later. Two more police officers at my door. They have mugshots. I tell them I was not making eye contact with the thug at the time, I was trying to minimise any escalation of his actions, so I couldn’t identify him from mugshots. ‘Hmm’.<br />August 7 2016. Phone call from B division. ‘We can’t identify who the driver was so we can’t take any action’.<br />September 17 2016. I write to the police expressing my despair at the lack of a prosecution.<br />September 18 2016. Two officers turn up and spend a long time explaining the ins and outs of the case and the reasons for their being unable to proceed. It goes along these lines, sort of.<br />The car was, at the time of the assault, registered in Wales and the registered keeper was defintitely in Wales at that time. The car was in Scotland, having been ‘traded’ but the paperwork not completed. By the time the police investigated my assault the car’s ownership was in doubt; not registered to anyone, no insurance detailed- nothing. All attempts to trace the occupants of the car that evening came to nought. It was a whole lot more complex than that, we spent an hour or so, me asking more and more questions, the police describing each cul de sac and the frustrations they felt. They explained that the witness, the police officer, had indeed reported the crime and had taken the action he had (asking the driver to get in the car and leave) because he felt that was the best way to reduce the immediate risk; he was alone and the guy was well-pumped up, and knew that I had the vehicle reg number so due process would catch the guy. Fair enough.<br />It seemed to me, although I’m filling in these details based on the looks on the officers’ faces rather than anything actually said, that the driver of the vehicle (Mr Punchy-Angry) took fright, and somehow got rid of the vehicle in the strict legal sense- so it now probably has become ‘another’ vehicle, with different plates etc.<br />Two frustrated police officers, to be fair, who clearly stated that at times like this the victim can feel let down. No shit eh? They also spoke about vulnerable road users, how they frequently sit in their unmarked cars and deal with those who close pass cyclists etc. All very nice. I told them about the West Midlands Traffic Police initiative (no brownie points for not already knowing this), and they told me about the atmosphere at the recent Bearsway meetings they had attended (much shaking of heads and muttering about ‘what’s wrong with these people?’)<br />Anyway, a cordial meeting, but the bottom line is the arrogant, entitled and violent thug got away with it. I can only hope that he had to spend a lot of money covering his tracks.</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i><b>Road crime 3 Justice 0.</b></i></blockquote>
magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-74011087878742111822016-09-09T17:06:00.003+01:002016-09-09T17:06:34.137+01:00East Dunbartonshire. Time for Change.Change.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiAm9WWtN9FuLz_6aIInIkKM4rCNxNS8ayWGUCGrXJK5GtgcdZYHCGdisMvf2WBOpXzW-XyFzEeuuhsNBI5iNHa4Q1sAKcnFXIAANs1FDokZxifCbiFpvVSA9YKohat_Hxe8cxYmF-KUczn/s1600/change.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiAm9WWtN9FuLz_6aIInIkKM4rCNxNS8ayWGUCGrXJK5GtgcdZYHCGdisMvf2WBOpXzW-XyFzEeuuhsNBI5iNHa4Q1sAKcnFXIAANs1FDokZxifCbiFpvVSA9YKohat_Hxe8cxYmF-KUczn/s400/change.jpg" width="238" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Today on Facebook I was reminded of a photo from 4 years ago. It was a photo of me with <a href="http://markbeaumontonline.com/">Mark Beaumont</a> at the finish area of Pedal for Scotland handing out <a href="http://www.pedalonparliament.org/">Pedal on Parliament</a> postcards with the word Change on them. This was early days in the Pedal on Parliament campaign when we were still finding out feet, and wondering if Change could really happen. It was a time when pretty much every council was paying, at very best, lip service to cycling. You'd get the odd ASL here, the odd painted lane there.<br />
<br />
The change we were asking for was fundamental. We weren't just asking for change in funding for cycling, we were asking for a significant change in political will.<br />
<br />
So what Change have we seen. At first glance you might think very little. We haven't reached the 10% of funding for active travel (5% for cycling), that we asked for. Yes, funding has increased, but only a wee bit. It hasn't gone down, which is probably a victory! So we've failed? No. The Change that has occurred has been more subtle.<br />
<br />
When we started there were battles even within the cycling community. To segregate or not segregate, that was the question. There were still many who felt that the roads were fine, that paint would help, and that education would supplement the paint. <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2012/05/time-to-reflect.html">There was a time that I thought that too</a>. Thus places like London pressed on with the 'Superhighways' which consisted of blue paint. A nice shade of blue paint, granted, but it was still just paint.<br />
<br />
Did the revolution come? No. In fact the lack of proper facilities just angered people more. <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-25591368">Worse, people were dying</a>. Bikes and HGVs especially were mixing in a way that would only end one way. The superhighways had failed. And so, in London the bloggers, the press and the people who cared, pushed on. Political pressure was applied. Eventually it paid off and <a href="http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/cycle-superhighway-2-boris-johnson-announces-25m-upgrade-to-notorious-bow-whitechapel-cycle-route-9750149.html">grand plans were announced</a>. Fantastic! Except, not everyone was happy. Many were furious!<br />
<br />
<i>There'd be bedlam. Traffic grid lock. Business would suffer. Why cater for a small minority?! There's no space! NO ONE WOULD USE IT!!</i><br />
<br />
It was painful to watch.<br />
<br />
Very politically difficult decisions had to be made. Amazingly they were.<br />
<br />
So work started.<br />
<br />
The anger didn't stop there. It got more vociferous. <a href="http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/lord-sugar-attacked-by-cyclists-on-twitter-after-suggesting-99-per-cent-accidents-would-be-avoided-a3122886.html">Angry celebrities in their chauffeur driven Rolls Royces talked of chaos</a>. Businesses set about <a href="http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest-news/taxi-drivers-threaten-legal-challenge-superhighway-plans-154628">legally challenging the lanes</a>. But the lanes went ahead despite it all. And then they were finished.<br />
<br />
What happened next was.....well, it wasn't chaos. It wasn't gridlock. It was something that previously many didn't believe possible. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLsMb1km7MI">The lanes worked</a>. People, not just Lycra clad warriors (I say that, having been labelled as one) or commuting die hards, came out to use them. I<a href="http://road.cc/content/news/195101-families-flock-londons-cycle-superhighways">t was people</a>, all shapes, sizes and ages. Families are now seen cycling through central London. Not up the back roads, not on a canal path far away from sight, but on main commuter roads. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxe4944p_DE">It was and is a wonderful sight to behold</a>.<br />
<br />
So now <a href="http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/green-light-for-northsouth-cycle-superhighway-linking-kings-cross-and-elephant-and-castle-a3334166.html">more lanes are planned</a>, and again the doomsters are fighting it.<i> It can't work!! Gridlock!! Etc.</i> However, the arguments are sounding a little more hollow, and fly in the face of what many can now see for themselves. That people can and do want to move around a city in a different way.<br />
<br />
Back in leafy Bearsden and Milngavie, we can hear cries of....<i>but we're a town, not a city. It's different here!</i> These bare more than just a passing resemblence to the the cries from London, <i>but we are a huge city, we aren't Amsterdam, it can't happen here.</i><br />
<br />
Of course it can.<br />
<br />
Example after example <a href="https://www.wired.com/2015/06/copenhagenize-worlds-most-bike-friendly-cities/">from Europe, from the US and beyond</a> are now showing us that everywhere isn't different. People are people, cities are cities and towns are towns, and given the right conditions where cycling is provided as a safe and viable alternative, it does happen.<br />
<br />
It's not easy of course, because Change never is. It involves making some sacrifices. It means that a road might have to be a wee bit narrower. It means that occasionally you might have to wait behind a bus for 20 seconds. It means that occasionally at junctions, priorities might need to be adjusted. The odd parking space has to be lost!<br />
<br />
<i>It feels like our liberties are being taken away from us.</i><br />
<br />
Are we truly free though? Is having a congestion free dual carriage way Bearsden Road which you can zoom down at 40 mph without impediment in your car really freedom? Only to be stuck in 2 miles of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMBzzeIhpuo">nose to tail traffic on the Switchback Road</a>, which is already dual carriage way, so perhaps we need three lanes each way? What about those that can't drive, perhaps as they are too young, can't afford it, or are not able to through disability. Sure, the bus is one option, but it will never truly provide the freedom that we yearn, by taking us from where we live to where-ever we want to go. It will help to some extent, and is part of the integrated solution, but it is not the whole answer.<br />
<br />
Freedom only comes when all those who wish to travel, by whatever means they wish, can do it in a way that is safe, comfortable and convinient. As London, and countless other examples demonstrate, if you build it, they will truly come. And they will come with the many, many benefits that having a significant percentage of your populations travelling actively will bring.<br />
<br />
So I call on the politicians and especially the councillors of East Dunbartonshire to think carefully about the future. Not just their own future, or at the ballot box next year, but for the future of an area I am sure they really do care for. I ask for them to consider that Change, even politically difficult Change is not only desirable, but needed for the area to flourish. Yes there is a strong local voice against it, but then many of them don't want <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2016/09/bearsden-and-milngavie-not-for-children.html">children to have freedom of safe movement</a>. Is that what you and your party stand for?! Really?<br />
<br />
If they chose not to invest in active travel, the area will drown under the weight of the motor vehicle, something that even many of the opponents of the Bears Way agree is an issue. The status quo, or returning the road back, 'to its former glory' is simply not the answer.<br />
<br />
Be on the side of change. Be on the side of a brighter, healthier, less polluted, less congested East Dunbartonshire. Be on the side of Change for a better future. An active travel East Dunbartonshire.magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-88272276863293202072016-09-04T14:06:00.000+01:002016-09-04T14:06:07.244+01:00Bearsden and Milngavie - Not for Children.<div class="tr_bq">
<div class="tr_bq">
Last week I attended a very aggressive and very depressing public meeting which was supposed to be focusing on the Phase 2 design of the Bears Way Cycle Lane. I honestly cannot put into words how utterly shameful the event was. It was the most intimidating atmosphere I have ever experienced at a meeting, in my life.</div>
<div class="tr_bq">
This is not, of course, how the local paper describes it. It focuses on the outrage of the braying mob at being held up a little, and the positioning of the projector. They didn't mention any of the reasonable facts that the council shared to counter the many unsupported assertions from the angry mob. They didn't mention the resounding 'NO!' to the question, should children be able to ride along the A81. They didn't mention the fact that people were saying that, 'if you don't live in the area, you don't have a say'.</div>
<div class="tr_bq">
<br /></div>
<div class="tr_bq">
I'm not going to link to the website article. It's just click bate. </div>
<div class="tr_bq">
<br /></div>
Rather than me trying to describe the meeting, I ask you to spare at least 10 minutes of your time to listen to some of the audio from the event. The audio is longer, and if you can, it is all worth listening to all of it (and the second half is linked at the bottom if you want the whole lot), but I can understand if you want to stop at about 10 minutes. Here it is here. On listening to this you will understand why I use words like lynch, braying and mob. I do not use them lightly.</div>
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mlZ6aNtRJkU" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
It's pretty shocking isn't it. I'm sorry you had to listen to that.<br />
<br />
Anyway, I will leave the rest of this blog to a guest blogger. He specifically answers one of the criticisms about access for emergency services. Many suggest, 'lives will be lost because the road is narrower and thus emergency vehicles will be held up'. He also answers many other points as well.<br />
<br />
The following is written by Dr Robbie Coull Pre-Hospital Immediate Care Doctor. He has agreed that I can share this with you.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
<i>The Bearsway cycle path is an excellent path that will really enhance the future health of the generations living in Bearsden and Milngavie. Thanks to the team at Bears Way and Sustrans and EDLC for making this possible.<br />As an advanced trained driver (IAM and blue light) who regularly uses the A81, I can give my expert opinion that the road is entirely safe. The only accident I've attended on the A81 was as the Hillfoot end of the Bearsway and was due to excess speed on a bend in the wet by the driver. ED Police have confirmed that all accidents on the new road have been due to such driver errors.<br />Having driven on the A81 in Hillfoot and Milngavie since 1986 when I first took my test, and passing my Institute of Advanced Motorists test in the area in the 1990s, it is my expert opinion that the old A81 was dangerous due to the excessive speeds being used on four narrow lanes. 36-40mph was the norm on the road for as long as I have been driving on it.<br />The Bearsway redesign means the A81 Hillfoot cannot be driven safely at speed in excess of the speed limit. I drive it at 25-30mph in good conditions. If you find the road 'feels' dangerous, then you should reduce your speed by 5-10mph and see how that feels. Remember to turn off the road over the cycle path at very low speed, checking for cyclists ahead and behind as you approach.<br />I'm happy to do ride along for anyone who is struggling.<br />There were concerns raised about older people and the disabled. Both groups can cycle given the correct infrastructure, and removing cars from the road improves the driving and parking for people with chronic illness that must use a car.<br />There were concerns raised about the buses. The buses were struggling to move once stopped and stopping on the carriageway shortens bus journeys. The average queue behind a stopped bus is 2-4 vehicles.<br />There were concerns raised about crossing the road if you have a disability or are frail because of the cycle safety kerb at Reid Ave. I've checked the route, and there are gaps in the safety kerb to allow crossing at Reid Ave as well as other points for bus stops along the route. This is now safer than before due to the slower speed and less lanes of traffic.<br />It was mentioned that cyclists are crashing into the architecture (bollards etc). While this may well to apocryphal (I've not come across any cases), if true it is still safer than crashing into cars due to the much lower Killed Seriously Injured (KSI) rates. This also applies to head on cycle collisions should any occur.<br />There were some wild fantasies about cyclists chatting, hitting the kerb and being thrown into traffic that can be discounted as much less of a risk than the old cycle paths.<br />There seemed to be a lot of anger at the meetings from groups of much older residents who reported increased journey times. I found this odd, as this demographic have less reason to be concerned about journey times than those working, looking after children etc..<br />Journey times are going to be increased from road calming meaning that excessive speeding that was the norm is now much more difficult. Complaining about not being able to break the law is not an acceptable concern.<br />Journey times will also be increased from lane reduction to clear space for vulnerable road users. This reduction is not great, and is a price that any right thinking person will see as a reasonable sacrifice to ensure a better environment and better health for our children and grandchildren. In civilised societies, the views of those not willing to make small sacrifices for the future generations are rightly discounted.<br />Furthermore, the mob of angry, bullying, rude people shouting down experts, ridiculing scientific evidence, and booing the idea of children cycling on cycle paths, devalued their standing in our society. Loud ignorant views are also rightly discounted when health and safety planning are being considered.<br />When an angry mob who's average remaining life expectancy is 10-20 years demand that their views should outweigh those of children who will be using the cycle path for the next 80 years, and those views are based on minor inconvenience and a desire to continue to break traffic laws, then we need to stand up to such bullies and say 'No, your behaviour is selfish, rude, and unacceptable in a civilised society'.</i></blockquote>
There is a follow up meeting this <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/bearsway">Wednesday 7th September in Milngavie Town Hall at 7pm </a>. Wouldn't it be fabulous if we had more reasonable voices there? Voices that call for safe infrastructure for all, and not just for those in cars? Voices that realise that children have as much right to independent, safe travel, as any adult?<br />
<br />
Please come to the meeting. Please write to the council (cycling@eastdunbarton.gov.uk) to let them know you support what they are doing, even though it might not be perfect yet.<br />
<br />
Please help us make East Dunbartonshire a cycle friendly area.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The following is the audio from the Q&A session toward the end of the meeting.<br />
<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/NVYX4cN4uX0" width="560"></iframe>magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-86586628476980066312016-08-29T21:22:00.001+01:002016-08-29T21:22:02.547+01:00BearsWay: A Tale of Two GentlemenThe Bear Way phase 1 wasn't perfect. Yes, I've said it. In fact I have previously gone into quite a bit of <a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2015/07/when-cycle-lanes-can-be-dangerous.html">detail about its shortcomings</a>. Of particular note are the entrances and exits which are badly designed and the fact that the lane swaps sides of the road part way through.<br />
Yes, mistakes were definitely made. It isn't perfect and I pointed that out. In fact I pointed it out in pretty strong terms. I have though since had plenty of opportunity to use it and watch it being used, and if I'm honest, it is far, far superior to what was there before. I regularly see kids riding on it, and I NEVER EVER saw kids riding along that road before. I was harsh when I initially reviewed it, and in hindsight, I was probably too harsh.<br />
<br />
Perfect? No. A big step in the right direction towards more people friendly streets? Yes!<br />
<br />
Unfortunately though very vocal sections of the local community have focused on on the flaws. In a big way. They are keen to point out the flaws ad nauseam. They are keen to flag up any incidents that happen in the area that in any way whatsoever might be connected to the existence of the cycle lanes. I don't remember them being outraged when I was having incidents in the old road lay out! They are keen to point out when a cyclist dares not to use the cycle lane. They are keen to point out that having had 14 knee replacements, and 5 new hips, their neighbour 6 doors down, won't be able to use it, so we should rip it up.<br />
<br />
Hmm.<br />
<br />
Still, some of their concerns are correct. Two lanes on one side of the road isn't perfect. I've not had many issues myself, but yes, some may have. Tweeks at the junctions could resolve all of these issues. The narrowing of the road has reduced the speed of traffic (I fail to see how this is a bad thing, but hey...). Some of the junctions are a little harder to get out of (although the main reason they are hard to get out of, seems to have been overlooked.....the huge amount of traffic!). The road is constantly congested beyond belief......Umm, actually, it isn't. A chap driving up and down the road 150 times has published data showing that on average you are held up <a href="https://www.facebook.com/bearswaycommuter/">1.3 seconds because of the lane</a>. Scary.<br />
<br />
But, let me be quite frank here. I'm going to be as honest about the possible outcome of phase 2 and beyond. There is a possibility, as mad, dangerous and utterly infuriating as it may sound, but if the next phases are designed properly.......<br />
<br />
Drivers and their cars may take slightly longer to drive this section of road.<br />
<br />
There. I said it.<br />
<br />
In fact a very wise man once said some very wise words on the subject:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>It is recognised that achieving these
targets will require a combination of
"pull" and "push". On the pull side is the need to offer an enhanced public
transport system with faster, more direct,
more frequent and more comfortable
services. Cycling will also be encouraged
with an enhanced, extensive, safe
network of routes with lighting and
secure parking. The push will come from
the use of parking restraints, a land-use
policy designed to minimise demand for
vehicle movement and the introduction of
a requirement for firms to develop
workplace transport plans which reduce
dependence on car commuting.</i></blockquote>
<br />
If we really want a better environment, reduced traffic, less pollution, better health, etc, we need to accept a little inconvenience. Spot on. In fact this wise gentleman goes on to say:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Individuals may have to accept restrictions on what they may presently perceive as their freedom to choose where, when and how to travel. Politicians and professional officers at both national and local government level will have to make difficult decisions regarding their attitude to transport and be prepared to promote and enforce restraints on the demand for movement.</i></blockquote>
<br />
I'd say this actually goes a little beyond what I'd want. Though I think he is suggesting that movement using the car might need to be restricted and that would help drive demand of more sustainable options (whilst understanding that not everyone can use those alternatives).<br />
<br />
Importantly he points out that the decision to do this is most likely to be difficult politically, and that those who will drive these schemes forward will find the going tough. Spot on again my friend, as we are finding out with BearsWay and over in Edinburgh with <a href="http://www.roseburncycleroute.org.uk/">Roseburn Cycle Route</a>.<br />
<br />
If only the residents of Bearsden and Milngavie would take head of this gentleman's words. Unfortunately even local retired roads experts don't heed these words, as is demonstrated in this letter.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFzeZvS1pUAGiOVUgvLI0tkxC7sieNn7nyuGRcuvtjLKX25wsNwz8XcNAFnSjzBJvx6r-WgVdY40B4QfCju-8-fDCpuWSkG9JNlQ2mUbH0x7MUNg6ojSQlaI1z4Y6qdX-ggkfsDNHtWbEd/s1600/roadchapletter.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFzeZvS1pUAGiOVUgvLI0tkxC7sieNn7nyuGRcuvtjLKX25wsNwz8XcNAFnSjzBJvx6r-WgVdY40B4QfCju-8-fDCpuWSkG9JNlQ2mUbH0x7MUNg6ojSQlaI1z4Y6qdX-ggkfsDNHtWbEd/s640/roadchapletter.jpg" width="476" /></a></div>
<br />
Just in case you can't read the letter in the picture, here is the relevant section:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>I have been lucky this year in my travels around Europe where I have seen exemplary practice in providing for cyclists where the authorities involved have managed to reconcile and promote the needs of all road users without adversely affecting the interests of any.</i></blockquote>
<br />
So this gentleman who, by his own words has spent his whole professional career in the field of transport policy and planning, thinks that the needs of all road users can be met without adversely affecting the interests of others. This is, as I am sure you can work out for yourselves, totally at odds with the comments of the first gentleman I quoted. It is also actually at odds with what happens in European cities where cycling is a major mode of transport. In Amsterdam for instance, many parking spaces have been lost! The first gentleman suggests that we need, 'push' and 'pull', if we are to (and this is a quote again from the first gentleman), '<i>to progress towards a user friendly transport environment</i>'. At POP we talk about a people friendly environment, but I think the sentiment is the same.<br />
<br />
Is it possible then to reconcile these two gentlemen's opinions. What differs between them, and can we bridge the gap?<br />
<br />
23 years.<br />
<br />
What?!!<br />
<br />
Yes, 23 years, is exactly what differs between these two gentlemen, or should I say this gentleman. You may have twigged already, but the chap writing the first piece (back in 1993) is in fact the same chap who wrote the above letter to the local newspaper. You can find his <a href="https://t.co/HbcQLdJ2Vr">original article here</a> and read from page 10.<br />
<br />
So what really has changed? I think that this chap was almost ahead of his time in 1993 writing as he did. He could see that increasing car ownership and use was not sustainable, and that change was required, and part of that change required investment in active travel. He could see that the change that was required, wouldn't be easy. It would be politically difficult. Now though, in his 2016 letter, rather than writing about it from a dispassionate distance, he is very much affected by the proposed changes personally, and he is doing what most of us do in that situation, fighting against the introduction of perceived difficulties that may directly affect him. He is fighting against the politically difficult decisions which he himself suggested were required.<br />
<br />
I totally understand where he is coming from. Change, when it affects someone else, is easy. It is not easy though when it affects you.<br />
<br />
In the short term, BearsWay will indeed cause local disruption. It might take a lane away here, and narrow a lane there. The road will not be as 'gloriously wide' as it once was (yes, I've heard people say that). It may take you a bit longer to get to Asda, or to pop to the golf club, or pick the kids up from school. But, for the sake of leaving the house a couple of minutes earlier, imagine what you could gain....<br />
<br />
Kids, getting much needed exercise on the way to school (when the lane is fully finished my kids could use it to get to their High School)..... 10% or even possibly more of the cars on the road, vanishing, as more people (who are able) deciding to take the bike to work and not the car...... As a result, lower traffic volumes, and thus and nicer environment to live in.... Lower levels of pollution (see section 4.2.7 <a href="http://www.gov.scot/seag/seagDocs/SEA-00958/16123.pdf">in this report</a>).... Lower traffic speeds, and thus fewer serious crashes and injuries.... Better population health.... More business footfall (yes cycling does bring more local business, to local businesses!).<br />
<br />
Medium to long term, its very likely that theinitia disruption would fade away. Eventually as cycling numbers increase negative effects on motor traffic would be offset by the shift in use away from the motor car.<br />
<br />
CAN'T HAPPEN HERE!<br />
<br />
Well that's pretty much what has said everywhere where this type of infrastructure has gone in, and amazingly it has always made a difference. Build it, and importantly, properly connect it, and they do come!<br />
<br />
We are now sat at a crossroads, On <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/bearsway">Thursday this week (1st) and Wednesday next week (7th) there will be public meetings in the evening in Milngavie</a>. The gentleman above will almost certainly be there. The chap who told me kids should cycle on the back roads will be there. The lady who really doesn't want the road narrowed will be there. Will you be there?<br />
<br />
Yes, it almost certainly will be horrible, It is likely to be full of emotion, prejudice and exaggeration. All the more reason why we need to be there to support something that, if it goes ahead, could be an asset for generations to come. We have been battling for segregated cycle infrastructure for years, now that we are tantalisingly close to getting something decent, we mustn't let it be watered down by NIMBYism.<br />
<br />
Let's show the future we care. Let's help make East Dunbartonshire a cycle friendly region.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-90587690843892488462016-05-12T22:34:00.000+01:002016-05-12T22:34:33.174+01:00Glasgow, A Cycling City!?Drugs.<br />
<br />
Yep, drugs.<br />
<br />
That's the only answer I could come up with that could explain a link I was forwarded today. The writer of the article must have been on some pretty powerful recreational drugs.<br />
<br />
At first the article made me laugh, but the article was not trying to be funny. Oh no. In fact this website was trying to list...<br />
<br />
'16 OF THE WORLD’S BEST CITIES FOR CYCLING (PLUS ONE ISLAND)'.<br />
<br />
Great, what's funny about that. Surely it will be a list consisting of quite a few cities from the Netherlands, and Denmark, probably with a few other notable European cities, perhaps Seville, or Berlin. Maybe the odd US city. Perhaps, at an absolute push it might mention London, who at this very moment is taking baby steps, but important baby steps, towards building a segregated network.<br />
<br />
It definitely wouldn't include Glasgow. No it wouldn't. Really!!<br />
<br />
It did.<br />
<br />
In at number 14, one place behind Amsterdam and one place above Berlin, nestled the Dear Green Place...Glasgow.<br />
<br />
Wow. Perhaps I've been riding in the wrong parts of Glasgow. Perhaps I've just missed the good bits. Ok, there is teeny, weeny wee green shoots appearing here and there, but they are teeny weeny. Perhaps it mentions the <a href="http://www.scotsman.com/news/transport/south-west-cycle-route-unveiled-at-scotland-street-1-3922598">South West cycle route</a>.......OK, by European standards its a bit...meh....but you know...<br />
<br />
No. Here is the wee bit on Glasgow.<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Glasgow is home to the breathtaking Red Tunnel that leads from Finnieston to Hydro. The tunnel is car-free and offers an exhilarating ascent and descent. Glasgow has more than 300 kilometers of cycle ways as well as a flat traffic-free route that runs from the city, through the quintessential Scottish countryside to the canal side town of Kirkintilloch.</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>All of Glasgow’s must see sites, including the Gallery of Modern Art, the Riverside Museum, the Tall Ship and the Lighthouse, are easily accessible by bike and within five minutes of a Nextbike station. (Nextbike is the city’s bike-share program.)</i></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br />
Wait a minute!!! A 'breathtaking Red Tunnel'?! 300km of cycle infrastructure? And a canal path? That's what gets you to number 14? Oh I suppose they mention the Nextbike hire scheme...ok, that's a good thing, but that certainly doesn't make Glasgow a cycle friendly city!<br />
<br />
So that Red Tunnel...What exactly is it?<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><img height="266" src="https://n0tice-static.s3.amazonaws.com/image/1413816565188403a6c1d4ef7e7c99bdc1c7b2e13c6df-mediumoriginalaspectdouble.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" width="400" /></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Source: <a class="_ZR irc_hol i3724" data-noload="" data-ved="0ahUKEwij3orJwtTMAhVD0hoKHcv0AekQjB0IBg" href="https://witness.theguardian.com/assignment/543bf53be4b05b59a7d0285a/1202773" jsaction="mousedown:irc.rl;keydown:irc.rlk" style="background-color: #f1f1f1; color: #7d7d7d; cursor: pointer; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 16px; text-align: start; text-decoration: none;" tabindex="0" target="_blank"><span class="irc_ho" dir="ltr" style="margin-right: -2px; overflow: hidden; padding-right: 2px; text-overflow: ellipsis; unicode-bidi: isolate;">witness.theguardian.com</span></a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Yes, it's a red tunnel with some green and red paint in it, Cyclists are supposed to keep to the green and pedestrians are supposed to keep to the red. It has a few sharp bends in it, it goes up and down and....well, it is a million miles away from breathtaking! That is unless it is the occasional smell of urine that is taking your breath away.<br />
<br />
Seriously this is not a good looking structure. It was built because the Exhibition Centre (and other more recent buildings) couldn't be built next to the train station. There is a ruddy huge road in the way!<br />
<br />
I actually searched the internet to see if I could find any pictures of the outside of it. I couldn't. Not surprising when you look at the Google Streetview picture of it....<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj8xNiGroQulPefbEOcwxMlIjcIjv8L2jlFeC37xDz76nKRAnX3QAwhkPgMGwOUQRlGK9Sg7cvVm9h_uTXlGzoQXJXhTo0AnGh_Bbjr-ttK745AdL0lbzfCtm2Y5Ebd2lvu-0GXIokrfNal/s1600/cyclebridge_secc.png" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" height="221" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj8xNiGroQulPefbEOcwxMlIjcIjv8L2jlFeC37xDz76nKRAnX3QAwhkPgMGwOUQRlGK9Sg7cvVm9h_uTXlGzoQXJXhTo0AnGh_Bbjr-ttK745AdL0lbzfCtm2Y5Ebd2lvu-0GXIokrfNal/s400/cyclebridge_secc.png" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Breathtaking? Hmm.<br />
<br />
But this is a minor issue. The biggest issue is the 300km of cycle infrastructure that Glasgow is supposed to have. Let me state this very, very clearly....<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Glasgow does not have 300km of cycle infrastructure!!!!!!!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
I'm not going to go into detail here, <a href="https://glasgowcycleman.wordpress.com/2015/06/16/305km-of-cycle-network-you-kidding/">GlasgowCycleMan hits the nail on the head with his analysis</a>, We currently have (its increased a bit) about 4km of segregated cycle route. We have about 70km of off road leisure (some commuting) routes. So we effectively have 74km of any type of reasonable route.<br />
<br />
The rest is made up of paint on the roads (20.6km), shared use, like the fabulous red bridge (83.km) of which the vast majority is absolutely pants, 40km of what is called calmed/low traffic routes (40km) which are actually just....umm, err...roads that are a bit quieter.<br />
<br />
Oh, and lets not forget the bus corridors. 83km of that. That is, roads that have some bus lanes. We can use those. We have to share them with buses of course...no problems there...ahem.... when there aren't any buses, sure they can be good. They can be reasonable. when there isn't a bus in it, and when the lane is within its enforced times, which it often isn't, oh and where the bus lane is continuous, which it almost never is.<br />
<br />
This bit is important..... The whole of the bus corridor is counted as cycle network. I cycle down a bus corridor sometimes on Maryhill Road. Lots of Maryhill Road has no bus lanes on it. That doesn't matter. It all counts in Glasgow City Council's network. Some of Maryhill Road does have bus lanes, lots doesn't. It all counts.<br />
<br />
So, dear article writer. I strongly suspect that you haven't ever set foot in Glasgow and, as I suggest at the start of the article, that you are on some really spacey drugs. Perhaps Glaswegian cyclists could do with those drugs and we would all be cycling in <a href="http://www.bikegobglasgow.com/">Unicorn Bike Land</a>.....man.....<br />
<br />
......What, you want to read the article in question?<a href="http://matadornetwork.com/sports/16-worlds-best-cities-cycling-plus-one-island/"> Well read on....man......</a>magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3805138158441245701.post-28915305686931361882016-05-06T19:40:00.001+01:002016-05-06T19:40:28.594+01:00Sticks and StonesIts the week leading up to Pedal on Parliament. Its always a busy week with e-mails flying back and forth between the organisers. At about 10:55pm on the 20th April, whilst I wasn't sending any e-mails, I was keeping an eye on them on my smart-phone whilst doing the ironing. That's pretty standard for me at that time of night on a 'school night'. In fact at this precise moment in time I was having a Twitter conversation with Ross Greer and making my mind up about voting Green in the Scottish elections.<br />
<br />
Crack!<br />
<br />
I hear a noise, definitely an unusual noise. I look into the hall and I see one of the cats mulling about. I look around for a moment and then assume it was just the cat knocking into something. I carry on as before.<br />
<br />
The next morning I get up, and head downstairs. I open the curtains and, in passing, notice a mark on the front window. It looks like bird poop, so I think nothing of it. I get ready to go to work and off I go.<br />
<br />
Later in the afternoon I get a text from my wife.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>When you get a chance can you look at the CCTV for today. Not sure if someone has tried to throw a brick at our front window.</i></blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>Eek! will do!</i></blockquote>
<br />
She'd spotted the marks on the window, and had taken a closer look. She also noticed a large rock in the garden.<br />
<br />
I get home and look, and sure enough, there is a mark on the window, that exactly matches the marks on the rock lying in our garden. I quickly fire up the computer and log in to our CCTV system. There it was. At 22:55 pm I see someone running into our garden and throwing a brick at the window, before scarpering off.<br />
<br />
Horrible, but fortunately no lasting serious done, apart from a few permanent scratches on the window...Double glazing is difficult to break apparently. Thankfully.<br />
<br />
I called the police. When they came and looked at the footage, they agreed that it looked targeted. The suspect clearly hid his face as he ran into the garden. He targeted us, despite us having CCTV cameras.<br />
<br />
Anyway a few days passed, as did a successful #POP2016, and life was heading back to normal (it takes a few days after each POP for that to happen!).<br />
<br />
Then on the 25th April at about 10:20pm, when I was in the kitchen doing pretty much the same thing as I was on the 20th.....I hear a strange crunching sound. This time I head straight for the front window. As soon as I look out I can see strange reflections of light from the ground next to the back of our car. It looked very much like glass. I rush outside to see that the rear window of our car had been smashed and a large rock was sat inside our car.<br />
<br />
They'd come back.<br />
<br />
Once again CCTV caught the act.<br />
<br />
Here is the CCTV footage from the two incidents.<br />
<br />
<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AtVFJuAGNq0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<br />
<br />
The police were called again. Once again they agreed, that this was targeted and that it was likely something to do with my cycle campaigning. They went around the neighbours, no-one saw anything unfortunately. After some further discussions they suggested that I could share the footage. So I have.<br />
<br />
I've been called names, I've been shot at, I've been threatened with arrest (<a href="http://www.magnatom.net/2011/08/i-was-almost-arrested.html">completely inappropriately I might add!</a>), I've been spat at, I've had death threats.<br />
<br />
The last 10 (almost 11) years have certainly been interesting. All, because I took up cycling and, goodness me.... I dared to stand up for myself and not accept that things just happen. I'm not alone in doing this, I'm just particularly well known for doing this.<br />
<br />
I am not anonymous and it is unfortunately very easy to find my address online. There's nothing I can do about that.<br />
<br />
So, someone has decided to take direct action. Well, I say direct, by that I mean against my property and not me personally. They have thrown a couple of large stones. Perhaps they were also behind the <a href="http://road.cc/content/news/153860-helmetcam-user-and-cycling-campaigner-targeted-drawing-pins-sprinkled-drive">tacks that were left at the end of my path previously</a>.<br />
<br />
What they expect to gain from this? I don't know.<br />
<br />
I haven't received any demands, or any messages. They might be a driver I've filmed, a driver I've reported, someone who doesn't like POP, someone who wants the Bears Way cycle lane ripped out, a cyclist who doesn't like what I do......etc....<br />
<br />
I just don't know.<br />
<br />
What's pretty clear is that this is aimed at me and is 99% certain to be something to do with my cycling, helmet camera use or campaigning. I don't do anything else controversial and neither does the rest of my family!<br />
<br />
So if anyone out there knows what this is about, please let me know. You can leave a message below (anonymously if you prefer). If you know who is doing this, either let me know or the police know via 101. Do you recognise the clothes the stone thrower (looks like slight to medium build) is wearing?<br />
<br />
From the videos it can be deduced that the person (persons) is/are wearing:<br />
<br />
Video 1: a cap, a puffer jacket with what looks like lighter patches on the shoulders, pale coloured shorts, a darker zip top under the puffer, possibly a watch or a strap on their left hand, and some trainers with distinctive bands on them as you can see in the video (anyone know the make?)<br />
<br />
Video 2: Same build, cap which has a slightly darker visor (possibly the same cap as before), and possibly a motif on the front...otherwise difficult to see.<br />
<br />
Were you in Torrance on either of these nights and did you see anything suspicious? Have you seen anyone boast about doing something like this online? Or have you heard anything about it in the pub?<br />
<br />
Anything you can do to help would be appreciated.<br />
<br />
As for cycle campaigning...well....there is still lots to do.....<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />magnatomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14920774671676488322noreply@blogger.com2